Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(taskfiles): Use empty list as default for optional task arguments passed via a ref (fixes 14). #15

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 6, 2024

Conversation

kirkrodrigues
Copy link
Member

@kirkrodrigues kirkrodrigues commented Nov 6, 2024

Description

As #14 describes, the behaviour of task has changed w.r.t. passing optional (undefined) variables via ref. It seems that task will now treat it as an empty string rather than leaving it as an undefined variable. Go is unhappy when trying to iterate over a variable which contains an empty string, but Go seems to skip iterating entirely if the variable is undefined.

I'll report this issue to the task devs, but in the meantime, this PR defines a default empty list for task parameters that we pass via the ref attribute.

Validation performed

  • Installed task v3.40.0
  • Validated task lint:check currently fails in clp-ffi-js
  • Applied the fix in clp-ffi-js's yscope-dev-utils submodule.
  • Validated task lint:check now succeeds.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the reference for the EXCLUDE_PATHS variable in the validate-checksum task for improved clarity.
    • No changes made to the core functionality of the compute-checksum task.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 6, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces changes to the taskfiles/utils.yml configuration file, specifically updating the reference for the EXCLUDE_PATHS variable in the validate-checksum task. This change clarifies the default behavior or structure of the variable. The compute-checksum task remains unchanged in its functionality, which computes checksums and handles errors. Overall, the modifications are limited to the variable reference, with no other tasks or parameters affected.

Changes

File Change Summary
taskfiles/utils.yml Updated EXCLUDE_PATHS reference in validate-checksum task from ref: ".EXCLUDE_PATHS" to ref: "default (list) .EXCLUDE_PATHS"; compute-checksum task remains unchanged.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant ValidateChecksum
    participant ComputeChecksum

    User->>ValidateChecksum: Trigger validate-checksum task
    ValidateChecksum->>ValidateChecksum: Reference EXCLUDE_PATHS
    ValidateChecksum->>User: Validation result

    User->>ComputeChecksum: Trigger compute-checksum task
    ComputeChecksum->>ComputeChecksum: Compute checksum
    ComputeChecksum->>User: Checksum result
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
taskfiles/utils.yml (1)

53-53: Consider enhancing the parameter documentation.

While the fix is solid, it would be beneficial to update the parameter documentation to explicitly mention the default behaviour:

-# @param {[]string} [EXCLUDE_PATHS] A list of paths, relative to `DATA_DIR`, to exclude from the
-# checksum.
+# @param {[]string} [EXCLUDE_PATHS] A list of paths, relative to `DATA_DIR`, to exclude from the
+# checksum. Defaults to an empty list if not specified.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fe2fb1b and 65f3f88.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • taskfiles/utils.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
taskfiles/utils.yml (1)

53-53: LGTM! Excellent fix for the Go iteration issue.

The change to use default (list) effectively addresses the issue where undefined variables were being treated as empty strings. This ensures proper handling in Go by defaulting to an empty list instead.

Copy link

@davemarco davemarco left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense to me. I will merge this unto my open clp-ffi-js PR, which will provide more confirmation

@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ tasks:
vars:
DATA_DIR: "{{.DATA_DIR}}"
EXCLUDE_PATHS:
ref: ".EXCLUDE_PATHS"
ref: "default (list) .EXCLUDE_PATHS"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I looked at https://taskfile.dev/reference/templating/#default-functions and believe our usage matches the explanations there.

@kirkrodrigues kirkrodrigues merged commit ad576e4 into y-scope:main Nov 6, 2024
1 check passed
@kirkrodrigues kirkrodrigues deleted the fix-ref branch November 6, 2024 22:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants