Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Temporarily lock clang-format to v18.x to resolve lint failures. #44

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 25, 2024

Conversation

LinZhihao-723
Copy link
Member

@LinZhihao-723 LinZhihao-723 commented Sep 25, 2024

References

#45

Description

This PR locks the clang-format version to 18.1.8 (which is the latest version 18 release in PyPI) as a temporary solution to fix the lint workflow failure due to the new major release of clang-format (version 19). We will fix this properly later by adapting clang-format version 19.

Validation performed

Ensure the workflow passed after locking clang-format version: https://github.com/LinZhihao-723/log-surgeon/actions/runs/11040699328

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the version specification for clang-format to lock it to the 18.x series for improved compatibility.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the version specification for clang-format in the lint-requirements.txt file from clang-format>=18.1.5 to clang-format~=18.1, effectively locking it to the 18.x series. This change is made with a comment indicating that the lock is temporary until the code can be upgraded to comply with the formatting standards of version 19. The version specification for yamllint remains unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
lint-requirements.txt Updated clang-format version from >=18.1.5 to ~=18.1; yamllint version remains >=1.35.1.

Sequence Diagram(s)

Loading
sequenceDiagram
    participant Developer
    participant CI
    participant Linter

    Developer->>CI: Push changes
    CI->>Linter: Run linting
    Linter->>Linter: Check clang-format version
    Linter-->>CI: Report linting results
    CI-->>Developer: Provide feedback

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
lint-requirements.txt (2)

1-2: LGTM! Consider adding a TODO comment for future reference.

The change effectively locks clang-format to the 18.x series, which aligns with the PR objectives and resolves the immediate lint failures. The comment clearly explains the reason for this temporary lock.

To further improve maintainability, consider adding a TODO comment with a link to an issue tracking the need to upgrade to clang-format v19 in the future. This will help ensure that this temporary fix isn't forgotten.

Here's a suggested addition to the comment:

 # Lock to v18.x until we can upgrade our code to meet v19's formatting standards.
+# TODO: Upgrade to clang-format v19 (see issue #<number>)
 clang-format~=18.1

Line range hint 1-4: Create an issue to track the upgrade to clang-format v19.

While this change effectively resolves the immediate problem, it's important to ensure that the upgrade to clang-format v19 isn't overlooked in the future.

Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track the need for upgrading to clang-format v19? This will help ensure that this temporary fix is revisited and a more permanent solution is implemented in due course.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 61d5803 and a1ee7a7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • lint-requirements.txt (1 hunks)

@LinZhihao-723 LinZhihao-723 merged commit 8e7db11 into y-scope:main Sep 25, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants