Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add duckduckgo-search to slim requirements, #2432

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 26, 2024
Merged

Conversation

hlohaus
Copy link
Collaborator

@hlohaus hlohaus commented Nov 26, 2024

Add pass provider as model in the client,
Fix missing @Property in version utils

Add pass provider as model in the client,
Fix missing @Property in version utils
github-actions[bot]

This comment was marked as duplicate.

Copy link

Review by G4F Copilot

Thank you, H Lohaus, for your contribution to the project. Here is the review of your pull request:

  1. Changes Made:

    • Added duckduckgo-search to slim requirements.
    • Added pass provider as a model in the client.
    • Fixed missing @property in version utils.
  2. Code Changes:

    • Updated async_client.md to use g4f.Provider.CopilotAccount as the provider.
    • Updated information in legacy.md about providers.
    • Added tests for model not found, best provider, provider as a model, and get model.
    • Updated code in various files related to Copilot provider.
    • Updated code in client.py to handle exceptions when model or provider is not found.
    • Updated CSS and JavaScript files for version information.
  3. Overall Feedback:

    • The changes look good and align with the requirements.
    • The addition of duckduckgo-search to the requirements is a useful update.
    • The test cases provide good coverage for the added functionality.
    • The code changes are clear and follow good coding practices.

Thank you for your contribution, and please address any feedback provided before merging the pull request.

@hlohaus hlohaus merged commit fdb4666 into xtekky:main Nov 26, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant