Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dialects: (x86) - mem access helper #2537

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 4, 2024
Merged

Conversation

KGrykiel
Copy link
Collaborator

@KGrykiel KGrykiel commented May 4, 2024

As per suggestion, I made a helper function for the memory accesses

@KGrykiel KGrykiel added the dialects Changes on the dialects label May 4, 2024
@KGrykiel KGrykiel self-assigned this May 4, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.82%. Comparing base (5237976) to head (1cfd6ee).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2537   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.81%   89.82%           
=======================================
  Files         351      351           
  Lines       44108    44079   -29     
  Branches     6592     6582   -10     
=======================================
- Hits        39615    39593   -22     
+ Misses       3532     3528    -4     
+ Partials      961      958    -3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@superlopuh superlopuh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@KGrykiel KGrykiel merged commit 17ca845 into main May 4, 2024
10 checks passed
@KGrykiel KGrykiel deleted the KGrykiel/x86dialect-MemAccHelper branch May 4, 2024 20:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dialects Changes on the dialects
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants