Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dialects: (x86) PR9 - MI Operations #2519

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 2, 2024
Merged

Conversation

KGrykiel
Copy link
Collaborator

@KGrykiel KGrykiel commented May 1, 2024

Implemented the support for operations with one memory access and an immediate value. Also I realized that I imported LabelAttr from riscv which is probably not ideal so I fixed that as well.

@KGrykiel KGrykiel added the dialects Changes on the dialects label May 1, 2024
@KGrykiel KGrykiel self-assigned this May 1, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 1, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.84%. Comparing base (c90e9be) to head (ff75702).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2519      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.85%   89.84%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         351      351              
  Lines       43840    43908      +68     
  Branches     6541     6559      +18     
==========================================
+ Hits        39394    39450      +56     
- Misses       3489     3500      +11     
- Partials      957      958       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@KGrykiel KGrykiel merged commit 1ad6db2 into main May 2, 2024
10 checks passed
@KGrykiel KGrykiel deleted the KGrykiel/x86dialect-PRs9 branch May 2, 2024 12:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dialects Changes on the dialects
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants