Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dialects: (LLVM) Fix use of attributes dict when dialect specifies prop_def #2144

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 13, 2024

Conversation

ed741
Copy link
Collaborator

@ed741 ed741 commented Feb 12, 2024

Fixes use of attributes dict when dialect specifies prop_def for:
llvm.extractvalue
llvm.insertvalue

Seems like a bug left over from #1874

@ed741 ed741 added bug Something isn't working dialects Changes on the dialects minor For minor PRs, easy and quick to review, quickly mergeable labels Feb 12, 2024
@ed741 ed741 self-assigned this Feb 12, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (0edc396) 90.17% compared to head (1ad8d19) 90.17%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2144   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.17%   90.17%           
=======================================
  Files         305      305           
  Lines       37041    37041           
  Branches     5515     5515           
=======================================
  Hits        33402    33402           
  Misses       2860     2860           
  Partials      779      779           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@math-fehr math-fehr merged commit 91a563f into main Feb 13, 2024
10 checks passed
@math-fehr math-fehr deleted the edward/llvm/properties_bug branch February 13, 2024 02:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working dialects Changes on the dialects minor For minor PRs, easy and quick to review, quickly mergeable
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants