Skip to content

chore(master): release execution 1.11.0#1459

Merged
ysmolski merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
release-please--branches--master--components--execution
Apr 8, 2026
Merged

chore(master): release execution 1.11.0#1459
ysmolski merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
release-please--branches--master--components--execution

Conversation

@StarpTech
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@StarpTech StarpTech commented Mar 26, 2026

🤖 I have created a release beep boop

1.11.0 (2026-04-08)

Features

  • check slicing Arguments passed when requireOneSlicingArgument (#1456) (72c181f)
  • handle recursion for arguments containing input objects (#1461) (ba21793)

This PR was generated with Release Please. See documentation.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@claude claude Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Claude Code Review

This repository is configured for manual code reviews. Comment @claude review to trigger a review.

Tip: disable this comment in your organization's Code Review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Mar 26, 2026

Note

Reviews paused

It looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the reviews.auto_review.auto_pause_after_reviewed_commits setting.

Use the following commands to manage reviews:

  • @coderabbitai resume to resume automatic reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a single review.

Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:

  • ▶️ Resume reviews
  • 🔍 Trigger review
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Added execution release 1.11.0 (2026-04-07) to execution/CHANGELOG.md noting slicing arguments are checked when requireOneSlicingArgument is used; bumped execution from 1.10.0 to 1.11.0 in release-please-manifest.json.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Release changelog
execution/CHANGELOG.md
Inserted new 1.11.0 section (2026-04-07) with a Features entry: slicing arguments are checked when requireOneSlicingArgument is used.
Release manifest
release-please-manifest.json
Bumped execution manifest version from 1.10.0 to 1.11.0.

Sequence Diagram(s)

(omitted)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

autorelease: tagged

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: preparing a release of the execution package version 1.11.0.
Description check ✅ Passed The PR description describes a release generated by Release Please for execution v1.11.0, detailing the features included in the changelog with specific references to issues and commits.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch release-please--branches--master--components--execution

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@StarpTech StarpTech force-pushed the release-please--branches--master--components--execution branch 2 times, most recently from 32a3421 to cc9106c Compare March 26, 2026 14:15
@StarpTech StarpTech force-pushed the release-please--branches--master--components--execution branch 3 times, most recently from 67720be to 611416f Compare April 8, 2026 09:58
@StarpTech StarpTech force-pushed the release-please--branches--master--components--execution branch from 611416f to ff28724 Compare April 8, 2026 10:17
@ysmolski ysmolski merged commit 7c59ee0 into master Apr 8, 2026
7 checks passed
@ysmolski ysmolski deleted the release-please--branches--master--components--execution branch April 8, 2026 10:19
@StarpTech
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

🤖 Created releases:

🌻

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants