Skip to content

chore(master): release 2.0.0-rc.195#1202

Merged
devsergiy merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
release-please--branches--master--components--graphql-go-tools
Jul 2, 2025
Merged

chore(master): release 2.0.0-rc.195#1202
devsergiy merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
release-please--branches--master--components--graphql-go-tools

Conversation

@StarpTech
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@StarpTech StarpTech commented Jul 2, 2025

🤖 I have created a release beep boop

2.0.0-rc.195 (2025-07-02)

Bug Fixes

  • fix checking presence of type mapping to interface object (#1201) (0a849ee)

This PR was generated with Release Please. See documentation.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Resolved an issue with checking the presence of type mapping to interface objects.
  • Documentation

    • Added a changelog entry for version 2.0.0-rc.195, detailing the latest bug fix.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 2, 2025

Walkthrough

The version in the release manifest was incremented to 2.0.0-rc.195, and a corresponding changelog entry was added describing a bug fix related to type mapping to interface objects. No changes were made to exported or public entities.

Changes

Files Change Summary
release-please-manifest.json Updated "v2" version from 2.0.0-rc.194 to 2.0.0-rc.195
v2/CHANGELOG.md Added entry for 2.0.0-rc.195: documents bug fix for type mapping to interface objects (issue #1201)

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0a849ee and 6154058.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • release-please-manifest.json (1 hunks)
  • v2/CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Build and test (go 1.23 / windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Build and test (go 1.23 / windows-latest)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
release-please-manifest.json (1)

2-2: Version bump looks correct

v2 moves from 2.0.0-rc.1942.0.0-rc.195, matching the changelog entry. Nothing else to flag.

v2/CHANGELOG.md (1)

3-9: Changelog entry consistent and properly linked

Entry follows the existing structure (heading, date, “Bug Fixes” section, issue & commit links). No discrepancies spotted.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@devsergiy devsergiy merged commit 0a37383 into master Jul 2, 2025
11 checks passed
@devsergiy devsergiy deleted the release-please--branches--master--components--graphql-go-tools branch July 2, 2025 02:16
@StarpTech
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

🤖 Created releases:

🌻

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants