Repository navigation
feat(router): allow split config polling #2814
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
dkorittki
merged 16 commits into
feat/split-configs
from
dominik/eng-9431-router-support-loading-deployment-configs-in-the-router
May 5, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4c16202
feat: add ActiveGraphs mapper type to node.proto
dkorittki 24b3add
feat: read feature claim from router jwt
dkorittki 519a4f3
feat: use split config polling if enabled via router token
dkorittki 8d675ea
fix: guard against nil variable
dkorittki 25b8ec5
Merge branch 'feat/split-configs' into dominik/eng-9431-router-suppor…
dkorittki 7cd3a63
chore: remove blank line
dkorittki 8c3e2df
chore: rename doGet to get
dkorittki d0675dd
chore: outsource hmac verification into own function
dkorittki 1dceabe
chore: use empty struct as type for map used as set
dkorittki 88953e5
fix: detect missing base graph entry
dkorittki 2284071
chore: small refactors
dkorittki 88ef61f
Revert "chore: outsource hmac verification into own function"
dkorittki 8159cb4
chore: use url.JoinPath instead of fmt.Sprintf
dkorittki fa66786
fix: use post request to CDN instead of GET
dkorittki 579de46
fix: path escape variables
dkorittki adf6a89
chore: add split fetcher tests
dkorittki File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: You could also use a hash set here to not use
slices.Contains()but have O(1) lookups but I don't think it really matters in this case. Up to youThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think we will ever run into the amount of features where we can feel this