[Customer Portal[BE] Update project response

[Rashmika998]

Description

• Update projects response to fetch the startDate and endDate.
• Rename the hasSR to hasSr.
• Add createdByMe field to search cases of a project.

Related PRs

• https://github.com/wso2-enterprise/digiops-cs/pull/1401

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Projects show a service-request indicator to identify projects with associated service requests
  • Projects include optional start and end dates for better timeline and scheduling visibility
  • Case search adds a "Created by me" filter to quickly find cases you created

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ed1774f and 8fc6473.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• apps/customer-portal/backend/modules/entity/types.bal

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• apps/customer-portal/backend/modules/entity/types.bal

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds three fields to ProjectResponse (hasSr: boolean, startDate?: Date, endDate?: Date) and one optional boolean filter createdByMe? to CaseSearchFilters in the customer-portal backend types file.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Types file updates apps/customer-portal/backend/modules/entity/types.bal	Added boolean hasSr, Date? startDate, and Date? endDate to public type ProjectResponse record; added boolean createdByMe? to public type CaseSearchFilters record.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• [Customer Portal][BE] Add issueTypeKey filter to case search and include issueTypes in metadata response #117: Modifies CaseSearchFilters in the same types.bal file — adds different optional filter fields.
• [Customer Portal][BE] Fix case search payload issue #113: Also updates CaseSearchFilters in types.bal (remaps state/severity fields); closely related at type-definition level.

Suggested reviewers

• shayanmalinda
• yuk7hi
• SParaparan

Poem

🐰 I hopped through code to add a tiny clue,
Flags for SRs and dates to view,
A filter for the cases I made,
Small changes — a tidy parade,
Hooray, the types now feel brand new! 🎉

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The pull request description is minimal and lacks required template sections such as Purpose, Goals, Approach, User stories, Release notes, Documentation, and others specified in the repository template.	Expand the description to follow the repository template, including Purpose (with issue links), Goals, Approach, User stories, Release notes, Documentation, Security checks, and other required sections.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title references updating project response and aligns with the main changes (adding startDate, endDate fields and renaming hasSR to hasSr), though it's somewhat generic.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}