Skip to content

Conversation

@octo-sts
Copy link
Contributor

@octo-sts octo-sts bot commented Dec 20, 2025

No description provided.

@octo-sts
Copy link
Contributor Author

octo-sts bot commented Dec 20, 2025

🔄 Build Failed: Git Checkout Error

Expected commit df85dadfe31bd09f5029e343b00b8656a6255319 for v18.7.0, found 901991dd22896ca37d58f46f8107bafc30fe2384

Build Details

Category Details
Build System melange
Failure Point git checkout step during source code retrieval

Root Cause Analysis 🔍

The git tag v18.7.0 points to a different commit (901991dd22896ca37d58f46f8107bafc30fe2384) than the expected commit hash (df85dadfe31bd09f5029e343b00b8656a6255319) specified in the build configuration. This indicates either the tag was moved/updated in the upstream repository or there's a mismatch in the build configuration's expected commit hash.


🔍 Build failure fix suggestions

Found similar build failures that have been fixed in the past and analyzed them to suggest a fix:

Similar PRs with fixes

Suggested Changes

File: gitlab-runner-18.7.yaml

  • update at line 32 (pipeline section, git-checkout step)
    Original:
expected-commit: df85dadfe31bd09f5029e343b00b8656a6255319

Replacement:

expected-commit: 901991dd22896ca37d58f46f8107bafc30fe2384

Content:

Update the expected-commit hash to match the actual commit that tag v18.7.0 points to
Click to expand fix analysis

Analysis

The pattern across all three similar fixes is consistent: when a git checkout fails due to an expected-commit mismatch, the fix is to update the expected-commit hash in the git-checkout step to match the actual commit hash that the tag points to. In all cases, the build files were updated to use the correct commit hash that corresponds to the specified version tag (v18.3.0 in the examples, v18.7.0 in the current case). The fixes show that tags can be moved/updated in upstream repositories, requiring the expected-commit to be updated accordingly.

Click to expand fix explanation

Explanation

The fix should work because the build failure indicates that the git tag v18.7.0 currently points to commit 901991dd22896ca37d58f46f8107bafc30fe2384, not the expected commit df85dadfe31bd09f5029e343b00b8656a6255319. This is a common occurrence in upstream repositories where tags can be moved, updated, or recreated. By updating the expected-commit field to match the actual commit hash that the tag points to, the git-checkout step will succeed. This approach directly addresses the root cause of the mismatch and follows the exact same pattern used successfully in the three similar fixes provided.

Click to expand alternative approaches

Alternative Approaches

  • Remove the expected-commit parameter entirely from the git-checkout step, which would allow any commit that the tag points to, but this reduces build reproducibility and security
  • Verify with upstream GitLab whether the tag was intentionally moved and if the new commit contains the expected v18.7.0 code before making the change
  • Use a specific commit hash instead of a tag reference, but this would require more frequent updates when new versions are released

Was this comment helpful? Please use 👍 or 👎 reactions on this comment.

@octo-sts octo-sts bot added the ai/skip-comment Stop AI from commenting on PR label Dec 20, 2025
@OddBloke OddBloke self-assigned this Dec 23, 2025
@octo-sts octo-sts bot added the bincapz/pass bincapz/pass Bincapz (aka. malcontent) scan didn't detect any CRITICALs on the scanned packages. label Dec 23, 2025
@OddBloke OddBloke removed their assignment Dec 24, 2025
@AmberArcadia AmberArcadia self-assigned this Dec 30, 2025
@AmberArcadia AmberArcadia requested a review from a team December 30, 2025 17:56
@bentasker bentasker merged commit 95790e6 into main Dec 31, 2025
19 checks passed
@bentasker bentasker deleted the gitlab-runner-18.7 branch December 31, 2025 10:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ai/skip-comment Stop AI from commenting on PR automated pr bincapz/pass bincapz/pass Bincapz (aka. malcontent) scan didn't detect any CRITICALs on the scanned packages. service:version-stream

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants