Skip to content

Conversation

@octo-sts
Copy link
Contributor

@octo-sts octo-sts bot commented Oct 21, 2025

No description provided.

@octo-sts
Copy link
Contributor Author

octo-sts bot commented Oct 21, 2025

🔄 Build Failed: Git Checkout Error

Expected commit 384c457ef5f0d5ca4981b22855e411d8cac2688e for v3.5.0, found a359575c82d87d72f22718df4ab9f092f4b5ba38

Build Details

Category Details
Build System melange
Failure Point git checkout step during package build - tag v3.5.0 verification

Root Cause Analysis 🔍

Git tag v3.5.0 points to a different commit hash than expected. The build configuration expects commit 384c457ef5f0d5ca4981b22855e411d8cac2688e but the actual tag points to commit a359575c82d87d72f22718df4ab9f092f4b5ba38. This indicates either the upstream repository has been updated with a different commit for the same tag, or the expected commit hash in the build configuration is incorrect.


🔍 Build failure fix suggestions

Found similar build failures that have been fixed in the past and analyzed them to suggest a fix:

Similar PRs with fixes

Suggested Changes

File: influxd-3.5.yaml

  • modification at line 42 (pipeline section, git-checkout step)
    Original:
expected-commit: 384c457ef5f0d5ca4981b22855e411d8cac2688e

Replacement:

expected-commit: a359575c82d87d72f22718df4ab9f092f4b5ba38

Content:

Update the expected-commit hash to match the actual commit that tag v3.5.0 points to
Click to expand fix analysis

Analysis

Looking at the three similar fixes, I observe a clear pattern: when a git checkout fails due to an expected-commit hash mismatch, the solution is to update the expected-commit value in the YAML configuration to match the actual commit hash that the tag points to. In all three cases (cockroach-25.3, gitaly-18.3, and sealed-secrets-fips), the fix involved updating the expected-commit field to use the "found" commit hash instead of the original "expected" one. This indicates that upstream repositories had updated their tags to point to different commits, which is a common occurrence in software development when tags are moved or recreated.

Click to expand fix explanation

Explanation

This fix should work because the error message clearly indicates that the git tag v3.5.0 currently points to commit a359575c82d87d72f22718df4ab9f092f4b5ba38, but the build configuration expects commit 384c457ef5f0d5ca4981b22855e411d8cac2688e. By updating the expected-commit field to match the actual commit hash, the git-checkout step will succeed since the verification will pass. This is exactly the same pattern observed in all three similar fixes - they all updated the expected-commit to match the actual commit that the tag was pointing to. The underlying cause is that upstream repositories sometimes move or recreate tags, which is a normal part of software development, especially when fixing issues or making last-minute changes to releases.

Click to expand alternative approaches

Alternative Approaches

  • Verify with upstream influxdata/influxdb repository that the tag move was intentional before updating the commit hash
  • Remove the expected-commit field entirely if commit verification is not strictly necessary for this package
  • Use a specific commit hash instead of a tag if immutable references are required

Was this comment helpful? Please use 👍 or 👎 reactions on this comment.

@octo-sts octo-sts bot added the ai/skip-comment Stop AI from commenting on PR label Oct 21, 2025
@bentasker bentasker self-assigned this Oct 22, 2025
@octo-sts octo-sts bot added the bincapz/pass bincapz/pass Bincapz (aka. malcontent) scan didn't detect any CRITICALs on the scanned packages. label Oct 22, 2025
@aborrero aborrero assigned aborrero and unassigned bentasker Oct 27, 2025
@aborrero aborrero requested a review from a team October 27, 2025 16:33
octo-sts bot and others added 5 commits October 28, 2025 11:14
The tag was updated so points at a different commit than it originally did

Signed-off-by: Ben Tasker <[email protected]>
Because there are no github releases but there are git tags.

Signed-off-by: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <[email protected]>
Cleanup.

Signed-off-by: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <[email protected]>
@aborrero aborrero requested a review from a team October 28, 2025 10:17
@OddBloke OddBloke merged commit 1e8ad45 into main Oct 28, 2025
18 checks passed
@OddBloke OddBloke deleted the influxd-3.5 branch October 28, 2025 11:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ai/skip-comment Stop AI from commenting on PR automated pr bincapz/pass bincapz/pass Bincapz (aka. malcontent) scan didn't detect any CRITICALs on the scanned packages. service:version-stream

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants