Skip to content

Conversation

@octo-sts
Copy link
Contributor

@octo-sts octo-sts bot commented Aug 8, 2025

@octo-sts octo-sts bot added request-version-update request for a newer version of a package automated pr aws-cli-2 labels Aug 8, 2025
@octo-sts
Copy link
Contributor Author

octo-sts bot commented Aug 8, 2025

🩹 Build Failed: Patch Application Failed

Hunk #1 FAILED at 14. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file requirements/download-deps/bootstrap-win-lock.txt.rej

Build Details

Category Details
Build System melange
Failure Point patch step - applying GHSA-5rjg-fvgr-3xxf.patch

Root Cause Analysis 🔍

The patch file GHSA-5rjg-fvgr-3xxf.patch failed to apply to requirements/download-deps/bootstrap-win-lock.txt. This is likely due to the patch being created against a different version of the file or the target file having been modified in a way that makes the patch incompatible. The patch system was unable to find the expected context lines at line 14 of the bootstrap-win-lock.txt file.


🔍 Build failure fix suggestions

Found similar build failures that have been fixed in the past and analyzed them to suggest a fix:

Similar PRs with fixes

Suggested Changes

File: aws-cli-2.yaml

  • version_update at line 4 (package.version)
    Original:
version: "2.28.6"

Replacement:

version: "2.29.0"

Content:

Update to newer version that likely includes the security fix
  • commit_update at line 35 (pipeline git-checkout expected-commit)
    Original:
expected-commit: d2e56dea9946cda6fa0bf098cf1240fd83e1917b

Replacement:

expected-commit: [new-commit-hash-for-2.29.0]

Content:

Update expected commit hash for version 2.29.0
  • removal at line 38-40 (pipeline patch step)
    Original:
- uses: patch
    with:
      patches: GHSA-5rjg-fvgr-3xxf.patch

Content:

Remove the patch step entirely
Click to expand fix analysis

Analysis

Based on the similar fixed build failures, there's a clear pattern: when patches fail to apply cleanly (typically with "Hunk #1 FAILED" errors), the most effective solution is to update the package to a newer version that already includes the security fixes, then remove the patch entirely. In all three examples, the fixes involved: 1) Updating package version to a newer release, 2) Updating the expected-commit hash, and 3) Removing the failing patch from the pipeline. This approach works because newer upstream versions often already incorporate the security fixes that were being applied via patches.

Click to expand fix explanation

Explanation

This fix should work because the pattern from all similar failures shows that when security patches fail to apply, it's typically because the target codebase has changed significantly from when the patch was created. The most reliable solution is to update to a newer upstream version that already incorporates the security fix (GHSA-5rjg-fvgr-3xxf). AWS CLI follows semantic versioning and regularly releases updates that include security fixes. Version 2.29.0 or later would likely include the fix for GHSA-5rjg-fvgr-3xxf, making the manual patch unnecessary. This approach eliminates the patch application failure while maintaining security by using the upstream-integrated fix.

Click to expand alternative approaches

Alternative Approaches

  • If updating to 2.29.0 doesn't include the security fix, try updating to the latest available version (2.30.x or higher)
  • If no newer version is available, the patch file itself could be regenerated against the current codebase by examining the specific changes needed and creating a new patch that matches the current file structure
  • As a last resort, the patch could be applied manually by directly editing the requirements/download-deps/bootstrap-win-lock.txt file to make the security fix without using the patch system

Was this comment helpful? Please use 👍 or 👎 reactions on this comment.

@octo-sts octo-sts bot added the ai/skip-comment Stop AI from commenting on PR label Aug 8, 2025
@OddBloke OddBloke self-assigned this Aug 11, 2025
@OddBloke OddBloke force-pushed the wolfictl-55b475ab-cc73-4eda-89fd-e7698c0da21c branch from 970f464 to 07b12c0 Compare August 11, 2025 17:33
@octo-sts octo-sts bot added the bincapz/pass bincapz/pass Bincapz (aka. malcontent) scan didn't detect any CRITICALs on the scanned packages. label Aug 11, 2025
@OddBloke OddBloke requested a review from a team August 11, 2025 17:57
@OddBloke OddBloke enabled auto-merge August 11, 2025 17:57
@octo-sts octo-sts bot closed this Aug 11, 2025
@octo-sts
Copy link
Contributor Author

octo-sts bot commented Aug 11, 2025

superseded by #62797

auto-merge was automatically disabled August 11, 2025 19:55

Pull request was closed

@octo-sts octo-sts bot deleted the wolfictl-55b475ab-cc73-4eda-89fd-e7698c0da21c branch August 12, 2025 00:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ai/skip-comment Stop AI from commenting on PR automated pr aws-cli-2 bincapz/pass bincapz/pass Bincapz (aka. malcontent) scan didn't detect any CRITICALs on the scanned packages. manual/review-needed request-version-update request for a newer version of a package

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants