Skip to content

Conversation

@octo-sts
Copy link
Contributor

@octo-sts octo-sts bot commented Jul 23, 2025

@octo-sts octo-sts bot added request-version-update request for a newer version of a package automated pr grafana-12.0 labels Jul 23, 2025
@octo-sts
Copy link
Contributor Author

octo-sts bot commented Jul 23, 2025

🔄 Build Failed: Git Checkout Error

FAIL Expected commit 76ea754dbb0bfb3e157981ec73ba4ef1efae4207 for v12.0.3, found b6513f5273c2f3cdab958d47c57789a0c5d03def

Build Details

Category Details
Build System git
Failure Point git checkout

Root Cause Analysis 🔍

The expected commit hash for tag v12.0.3 in the package definition doesn't match the actual commit hash in the Git repository. The package definition expected commit 76ea754dbb0bfb3e157981ec73ba4ef1efae4207, but the Git repository has commit b6513f5273c2f3cdab958d47c57789a0c5d03def for that tag.


🔍 Build failure fix suggestions

Found similar build failures that have been fixed in the past and analyzed them to suggest a fix:

Similar PRs with fixes

Suggested Changes

File: grafana-12.0.yaml

  • replace at line 39 (expected-commit value in git-checkout section)
    Original:
      expected-commit: 76ea754dbb0bfb3e157981ec73ba4ef1efae4207

Replacement:

      expected-commit: b6513f5273c2f3cdab958d47c57789a0c5d03def

Content:

Replace the outdated expected commit hash with the actual commit hash from the repository for tag v12.0.3
Click to expand fix analysis

Analysis

The pattern across all three similar fixed build failures is consistent: when there's a mismatch between the expected Git commit hash in the package definition and the actual commit hash for a specific tag in the repository, the fix always involves updating the expected-commit hash to match what's actually in the Git repository. This typically happens when:

  1. A tag is moved or updated in the upstream repository
  2. The package version is updated, but the expected-commit hash wasn't updated accordingly
  3. Git tags point to tag objects instead of directly to commits, requiring the commit hash to be updated

In all examples, the solution was to update the expected-commit hash in the YAML file to match the actual commit that the tag points to in the repository. This is a straightforward fix that doesn't require complex changes to the build configuration.

Click to expand fix explanation

Explanation

This fix addresses the root cause of the build failure by updating the expected-commit hash in the git-checkout section to match the actual commit hash that tag v12.0.3 points to in the Grafana repository.

The error message clearly indicates that the build system expected commit 76ea754dbb0bfb3e157981ec73ba4ef1efae4207 for v12.0.3, but found b6513f5273c2f3cdab958d47c57789a0c5d03def instead. This mismatch is causing the build to fail because the git-checkout step is designed to verify that the expected commit matches the actual commit for security and reproducibility reasons.

When the git-checkout pipeline step runs, it fetches the specified tag (v12.0.3) from the repository and then verifies that the commit it points to matches the expected-commit value. Since these don't match, the build fails.

This mismatch could have occurred for several reasons:

  1. The upstream repository might have moved the tag to point to a different commit
  2. The tag might point to a tag object rather than directly to a commit (similar to Fix Example #0)
  3. The expected-commit value might have been incorrectly entered when the package was initially created

By updating the expected-commit hash to b6513f5273c2f3cdab958d47c57789a0c5d03def, we're telling the build system to expect the current commit that the v12.0.3 tag points to, which will allow the build to proceed successfully.

Click to expand alternative approaches

Alternative Approaches

  • Verify if there's a newer version of Grafana (e.g., v12.0.4) that could be used instead, which would involve updating both the package version and the expected-commit hash
  • If the version discrepancy is due to a Git tag that points to a tag object rather than a commit, we could modify the git-checkout step to add '--dereference-tags' option, though this would be a more invasive change to the build system
  • Check if the upstream repository has been rebased or if the tag has been moved intentionally, and consider reaching out to upstream maintainers to understand why the tag points to a different commit than expected

Was this comment helpful? Please use 👍 or 👎 reactions on this comment.

@octo-sts octo-sts bot added the ai/skip-comment Stop AI from commenting on PR label Jul 23, 2025
Signed-off-by: Debasish Biswas <[email protected]>
@AmberArcadia AmberArcadia self-assigned this Jul 25, 2025
@octo-sts octo-sts bot added the bincapz/pass bincapz/pass Bincapz (aka. malcontent) scan didn't detect any CRITICALs on the scanned packages. label Jul 28, 2025
@AmberArcadia AmberArcadia requested a review from a team July 28, 2025 15:30
@powersj powersj merged commit a35f715 into main Jul 28, 2025
18 checks passed
@powersj powersj deleted the wolfictl-e860830b-b66f-425d-a592-c1285746ee49 branch July 28, 2025 21:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ai/skip-comment Stop AI from commenting on PR automated pr bincapz/pass bincapz/pass Bincapz (aka. malcontent) scan didn't detect any CRITICALs on the scanned packages. grafana-12.0 manual/review-needed request-version-update request for a newer version of a package

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants