Skip to content

Conversation

@octo-sts
Copy link
Contributor

@octo-sts octo-sts bot commented Jun 20, 2025

No description provided.

@octo-sts
Copy link
Contributor Author

octo-sts bot commented Jun 20, 2025

🔄 Build Failed: Git Checkout Error

FAIL Expected commit 705c6df32af295dbc5204dd918c81ef4f5027450 for v18.1.0, found 290a9ef14ad59a4d1d0c57da095860152d1b1090

Build Details

Category Details
Build System git
Failure Point git checkout of GitLab KAS repository

Root Cause Analysis 🔍

The commit hash specified in the build configuration (705c6df32af295dbc5204dd918c81ef4f5027450) doesn't match the actual commit hash for the tag v18.1.0 in the repository (290a9ef14ad59a4d1d0c57da095860152d1b1090). This indicates either the tag has been moved in the upstream repository or there's an incorrect commit hash in the build configuration.


🔍 Build failure fix suggestions

Found similar build failures that have been fixed in the past and analyzed them to suggest a fix:

Similar PRs with fixes

Suggested Changes

File: gitlab-kas-18.1.yaml

  • modification at line 24 (In the git-checkout step of the pipeline)
    Original:
      expected-commit: 705c6df32af295dbc5204dd918c81ef4f5027450

Replacement:

      expected-commit: 290a9ef14ad59a4d1d0c57da095860152d1b1090

Content:

Update the expected-commit hash to match the actual commit hash for tag v18.1.0
Click to expand fix analysis

Analysis

After analyzing the similar fixed build failures, I observe a consistent pattern: all three cases involve a mismatch between the expected commit hash specified in the build configuration and the actual commit hash for the tagged version in the Git repository. In each case, the fix was to update the expected-commit parameter in the git-checkout step to match the actual commit hash for the specified tag. This is a common issue when upstream repositories update or move their tags to point to different commits. The build system correctly identifies these mismatches as errors to ensure build reproducibility and security.

Click to expand fix explanation

Explanation

The error message clearly indicates that the current build failure is due to a mismatch between the expected commit hash specified in the build configuration (705c6df32af295dbc5204dd918c81ef4f5027450) and the actual commit hash for the v18.1.0 tag in the GitLab KAS repository (290a9ef14ad59a4d1d0c57da095860152d1b1090).

This type of mismatch happens for several reasons:

  1. The upstream repository maintainers may have moved the tag to point to a different commit (perhaps to fix an issue in the release)
  2. The tag could be a tag object rather than directly pointing to a commit, and the build system is resolving to the underlying commit
  3. The original commit hash may have been incorrectly specified in the melange YAML

The fix is straightforward: update the expected-commit value in the git-checkout step to match the actual commit hash that the tag points to. This ensures that the build system can correctly check out the repository at the exact commit referenced by the tag.

The error message already provides the correct commit hash (290a9ef14ad59a4d1d0c57da095860152d1b1090), so we can update the configuration to use this value. This approach is consistent with the fixes applied in all three similar cases, where the expected-commit was updated to match the actual commit hash for the tag.

Click to expand alternative approaches

Alternative Approaches

  • Another approach would be to verify the commit hash directly from the upstream repository before updating the YAML file. This can be done with: git ls-remote https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/cluster-integration/gitlab-agent v18.1.0 to get the current commit hash the tag points to.
  • If there's a specific reason to use the original commit (705c6df32af295dbc5204dd918c81ef4f5027450), we could change the git-checkout to reference the commit directly instead of using the tag. However, this would diverge from upstream versioning and is generally not recommended.
  • For more robust future updates, we could implement a pre-build verification step that compares expected and actual commit hashes, updating the expected-commit value automatically when creating new package versions.

Was this comment helpful? Please use 👍 or 👎 reactions on this comment.

@octo-sts octo-sts bot added the ai/skip-comment Stop AI from commenting on PR label Jun 20, 2025
@debasishbsws debasishbsws self-assigned this Jun 20, 2025
Signed-off-by: Debasish Biswas <[email protected]>
@octo-sts octo-sts bot added the bincapz/pass bincapz/pass Bincapz (aka. malcontent) scan didn't detect any CRITICALs on the scanned packages. label Jun 20, 2025
@debasishbsws debasishbsws requested a review from a team June 20, 2025 16:05
@debasishbsws debasishbsws enabled auto-merge (squash) June 20, 2025 16:35
@debasishbsws debasishbsws merged commit a71d44a into main Jun 20, 2025
18 checks passed
@debasishbsws debasishbsws deleted the gitlab-kas-18.1 branch June 20, 2025 17:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ai/skip-comment Stop AI from commenting on PR automated pr bincapz/pass bincapz/pass Bincapz (aka. malcontent) scan didn't detect any CRITICALs on the scanned packages. service:version-stream

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants