Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simplify autogen #758

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 15, 2025
Merged

Conversation

ejohnstown
Copy link
Contributor

The autogen script is doing too many things. The tests that are set up in the git hooks are already tested by GitHub with actions on branch push. Also they don't work if you install wolfSSL somewhere specific. All one needs to do is run autoreconf -ivf to make the configure script. This is all autogen does now, with the addition of warnings.

The autogen script is doing too many things. The tests that are set up
in the git hooks are already tested by GitHub with actions on branch
push. Also they don't work if you install wolfSSL somewhere specific.
All one needs to do is run `autoreconf -ivf` to make the configure
script. This is all autogen does now, with the addition of warnings.
@JacobBarthelmeh JacobBarthelmeh merged commit cec90f8 into wolfSSL:master Jan 15, 2025
67 checks passed
@gojimmypi
Copy link
Contributor

Confirmed working on WSL. Nice change to simplify things.

Thanks @ejohnstown for assistance regarding my error when using ~/ in the path.

 ./configure --with-wolfssl=~/wolfssl-install-dir

that resulted in:

[...]
checking for forkpty in -lutil... yes
checking for wolfSSL... configure: prefix NONE
configure: error: wolfSSL path error (~/wolfssl-install-dir/): missing lib and include

Using a fully-qualified path worked:

 ./configure --with-wolfssl=/home/gojimmypi/wolfssl-install-dir-with-ssh

Copy link
Contributor

@gojimmypi gojimmypi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tested and confirmed working on WSL

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants