GH-28: add support for multiple property injection

[rfelgent]

hi @maciejwalkowiak ,

here is the pull request for #28.

Please let me know what else I can do for this pull request to be accepted.

[maciejwalkowiak]

I did some polishing, but seems I can't push to your branch, so take a look at this commit: 4a85af0

Unless there's something that i've missed, feel free to cherry-pick it and update your branch.

Also please update a readme, like a line or two that you can also set multiple properties and why would you want to do that.

Once its there, I'll merge and trigger a new release.

Thanks for contribution!

[rfelgent]

Hi @maciejwalkowiak ,

I added some hints about the multiple property injection feature. Please have look at the README.md.
While updating the README.md, 2 questions came into my mind:

• should we rename the attribute from property to properties (hard migration with breaking changes) or
• should we add another attribute called properties and it can co-exists with property (soft migration, no breaking changes)

Greetings

PS: I am not used to work with forks. I created another PR for updating the README.md #31

[rfelgent]

current implementation is fully backward compatible.

But its readability is not as good as it could be when renaming the attribute to properties, is it ?

[maciejwalkowiak]

Indeed. Add properties and mark property as deprecated. For the time being we will support both, later the property will be removed.

[maciejwalkowiak]

Thanks @rfelgent! Thanks for updating readme, don't worry it is in another branch, i'll put it into main all together when we have this PR ready.

[rfelgent]

Hi @maciejwalkowiak ,

I renamed/refactored the attributes property and properties of ConfigureWireMock.
Please have a look at https://github.com/maciejwalkowiak/wiremock-spring-boot/pull/32/files

[rfelgent]

Hi @maciejwalkowiak ,

please let me know what else I can do for this merge request.

[maciejwalkowiak]

Apologies for late reply. Thanks again for a PR!