-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 63
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Resuming incremental search requires two presses of C-s #108
Comments
I wonder if binding to "Find Next" in all cases (ie, not just when |
A hack I threw together for this which seems to work is:
Probably an abuse of overriding |
@joeshaw, is there a way I can try the above "hack"? ... Thanks for your suggestion! |
@joeshaw Thank you for the suggestion. |
In emacs, C-s resumes a previous incremental search. In VSCode this requires two presses. This new find command emulates the Emacs behavior. Fixes whitphx#108
I submitted a PR for it, #209. |
In emacs, C-s resumes a previous incremental search. In VSCode this requires two presses. This new find command emulates the Emacs behavior. Fixes whitphx#108
In emacs, C-s resumes a previous incremental search. In VSCode this requires two presses. This new find command emulates the Emacs behavior. Fixes whitphx#108
In emacs, C-s resumes a previous incremental search. In VSCode this requires two presses. This new find command emulates the Emacs behavior. Fixes whitphx#108
Steps to Reproduce:
Expected Behavior
Resuming incremental search would have immediately resumed the search and jumped to the next match from current cursor location.
Versions
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: