Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Concepts - Review, Organize, Define Clear Goals #1386

Open
tanyagray opened this issue Jul 7, 2017 · 8 comments
Open

Concepts - Review, Organize, Define Clear Goals #1386

tanyagray opened this issue Jul 7, 2017 · 8 comments
Labels

Comments

@tanyagray
Copy link
Contributor

tanyagray commented Jul 7, 2017

The content of the Concepts section needs to be reviewed for the following:

  • Overall goals and target audience of the concepts section
  • Organisation and structure of key concept areas
  • Content - anything missing?

cc @TheLarkInn

@TheLarkInn
Copy link
Member

TheLarkInn commented Jul 11, 2017

I'll start with the goal(s):

I started writing the Concepts section modeled after some of the talks I had done at conferences prior to. It featured talking about key concepts vs configuration properties that I felt people should be aware of.

GOAL: Give people a clear super-high level overview of how webpack works by teaching them the 4 main pieces that one might use in their configuration. This should give people enough confidence to run with it, understand how to use any loader or any plugin, or leverage any entry or output properties with basic usage.

With that in mind, I'm really happy to have you gauge if you feel we are lacking or needing more information. It is admittedly hard for me to tell whether or not the information is enough to leave people confident.

@tanyagray
Copy link
Contributor Author

@TheLarkInn would you say the Concepts section is targeted at people who possibly have not used a bundler before? If so I have some re-wording suggestions that I'll do PRs for.

@TheLarkInn
Copy link
Member

Yes!! Not only no bundlers, but no understanding of a js module. I picture me circa 2 years ago never seeing module.exports and export default and how grunt just concatenates stuff together.

@TheLarkInn
Copy link
Member

Are you wanting to do in one pass or document issues, then that way we can track it? Take step by step etc.

@shaodahong
Copy link
Contributor

@TheLarkInn Webpack base on module, but if no understanding of module, should be suggust to study module, Is this mean?

@tanyagray
Copy link
Contributor Author

Documenting issues is a good idea. Will do.

@TheLarkInn
Copy link
Member

Awesome I just saw that! It's a a great audit. Do you want to tie it to this one?

skipjack referenced this issue Aug 11, 2017
This adds a solid baseline for how to start improving build performance
with specific pointers for development and production. It can be built on
in other PRs but probably doesn't need to be synchronized with the earlier
guides (as it's a lot of one off changes that depend on your use case).
@TheDutchCoder
Copy link
Collaborator

Currently working on #1416 with PR #1673
Thanks for bringing this to our attention @tanyagray 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants