-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 344
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(http-core): test pipeline #3949
base: next
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve a modification to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/@webex/http-core/src/request/index.js
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/@webex/http-core/src/request/index.js (1)
Line range hint 13-20
: Verify the scope and impact of this change
This implementation change raises several concerns:
- The PR is titled "test pipeline" but includes implementation changes to URL handling
- The impact on existing code that might rely on
options.url
remaining available needs verification - No tests are included despite this being a testing-related PR
Let's verify the usage of options.url in the codebase:
Consider:
- Adding unit tests to verify this URL handling behavior
- Documenting why this change is necessary for the test pipeline
- Adding JSDoc to explain the URL to URI conversion behavior
Would you like me to help draft the test cases for this change?
✅ Verification successful
URL to URI normalization is an existing, tested behavior
The implementation change is consistent with the existing codebase behavior:
- The code in
utils.ts
already performs the same URL to URI normalization - There's an existing test case specifically for this normalization: "normalizes
options.url
asoptions.uri
" - The
xhr.js
module already handles bothoptions.uri
andoptions.url
equivalently
The change appears to be consolidating the URL normalization behavior that's already present in the codebase, rather than introducing a breaking change.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any code that might be reading options.url after this function
rg -l "options\.url" packages/@webex/
# Search for test files that might need updating
rg -l "options\.url.*test" packages/@webex/
Length of output: 880
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual usage of options.url in the found files
rg -B2 -A2 "options\.url" packages/@webex/http-core/src/request/request.js packages/@webex/http-core/src/request/utils.ts packages/@webex/http-core/src/lib/xhr.js packages/@webex/http-core/test/integration/spec/request.js
# Check if there are any tests specifically for URL handling
rg -B2 -A2 "url.*test|test.*url" packages/@webex/http-core/test/
Length of output: 2522
options.url = undefined; | ||
options.url = null; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Simplify the url cleanup logic
The current implementation has redundant assignments:
- Setting to
undefined
followed immediately bynull
is unnecessary - These assignments don't fully clean up the property from the options object
Consider this cleaner approach:
- options.url = undefined;
- options.url = null;
+ delete options.url;
This will:
- Remove the property entirely instead of leaving it as null
- Make the code more concise and clearer in its intent
- Prevent any potential memory leaks from keeping the property around
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
options.url = undefined; | |
options.url = null; | |
delete options.url; |
This pull request is automatically being deployed by Amplify Hosting (learn more). |
testing pipeline
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
options
parameter in the request function, ensuring proper assignment of URL properties.Refactor