Skip to content

docs: update node version requirements for v2#7170

Merged
chenjiahan merged 2 commits intomainfrom
docs/update-node-version
Feb 10, 2026
Merged

docs: update node version requirements for v2#7170
chenjiahan merged 2 commits intomainfrom
docs/update-node-version

Conversation

@Timeless0911
Copy link
Contributor

@Timeless0911 Timeless0911 commented Feb 10, 2026

Summary

Update Node.js version requirements for Rsbuild v2 (20.19+, 22.12+).

Related Links

None.

Checklist

  • Tests updated (or not required).
  • Documentation updated (or not required).

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 10, 2026 09:45
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @Timeless0911, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the quick-start documentation for Rsbuild v2 to reflect the latest recommended Node.js version requirements. The change ensures that users are guided towards stable and supported Long Term Support (LTS) versions, enhancing compatibility and providing a more reliable development environment.

Highlights

  • Node.js Version Update: The documentation for Rsbuild v2 has been updated to recommend Node.js LTS versions >= 20.19.0 or >= 22.12.0.
Changelog
  • website/docs/en/guide/start/quick-start.mdx
    • Updated the Node.js version requirement for Rsbuild v2 to >= 20.19.0 or >= 22.12.0 (LTS versions recommended).
  • website/docs/zh/guide/start/quick-start.mdx
    • Updated the Node.js version requirement for Rsbuild v2 in the Chinese documentation to >= 20.19.0 或 >= 22.12.0(推荐使用 LTS 版本).
Activity
  • No specific activity (comments, reviews, or progress updates) has been recorded for this pull request yet.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the Node.js version requirements for Rsbuild v2 in the documentation. The changes are in both English and Chinese quick-start.mdx files. My review focuses on the correctness of the specified Node.js versions. I found that the versions mentioned (20.19.0 and 22.12.0) appear to be incorrect as they don't correspond to actual Node.js releases. I've suggested corrections to align the documentation with the engines field in package.json (>=20.10.0) for accuracy, while still keeping the recommendation for LTS versions.

@cloudflare-workers-and-pages
Copy link

Deploying rsbuild with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: e747d7e
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://e14ca913.rsbuild-v2.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://docs-update-node-version.rsbuild-v2.pages.dev

View logs

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the Quick Start documentation to reflect Rsbuild v2’s recommended Node.js LTS version requirements.

Changes:

  • Update English Quick Start to state Rsbuild v2 Node.js requirements as >= 20.19.0 or >= 22.12.0 (LTS recommended).
  • Update Chinese Quick Start with the same Node.js requirement guidance.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

File Description
website/docs/en/guide/start/quick-start.mdx Updates the Rsbuild v2 Node.js version requirement line in the Version requirements tip.
website/docs/zh/guide/start/quick-start.mdx Updates the Rsbuild v2 Node.js version requirement line in the 版本要求 tip.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@chenjiahan chenjiahan enabled auto-merge (squash) February 10, 2026 09:53
@chenjiahan chenjiahan merged commit 8994322 into main Feb 10, 2026
6 checks passed
@chenjiahan chenjiahan deleted the docs/update-node-version branch February 10, 2026 09:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

Comments