Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[fix issue #679] add details when calling unimplemented! #861

Conversation

pventuzelo
Copy link
Contributor

@pventuzelo pventuzelo commented Oct 3, 2019

Description

As discuss in issue #679, unimplemented! should provide a string to explain at least where the issue occurs. This pull request only add messages on existing unimplemented! and don't change any previous logics/behaviors in the code.

Review

  • Add a short description of the the change to the CHANGELOG.md file

Copy link
Contributor

@MarkMcCaskey MarkMcCaskey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is great! Thanks!

@pventuzelo
Copy link
Contributor Author

i just fixed an error happening during build docs.
Build need to run again.

@MarkMcCaskey
Copy link
Contributor

bors r+

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2019
861: [fix issue #679] add details when calling unimplemented! r=MarkMcCaskey a=pventuzelo

# Description

As discuss in issue #679, `unimplemented!` should provide a string to explain at least where the issue occurs. This pull request only add messages on existing `unimplemented!` and don't change any previous logics/behaviors in the code.

# Review

- [x] Add a short description of the the change to the CHANGELOG.md file


Co-authored-by: Patrick Ventuzelo <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Mark McCaskey <[email protected]>
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Oct 23, 2019

Build succeeded

  • wasmerio.wasmer

@bors bors bot merged commit 0fd0ab6 into wasmerio:master Oct 23, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants