make AppConfig.name
optional in wasmer-config
#5305
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The wasmer-cli treats
AppConfig
objects without names as valid, butthis behavior is not reflected in the
AppConfig
schema.This discrepancy caused issues when attempting to parse a "valid"
AppConfig
as per the wasmer cli. Wasmer CLI injects a nameif it does not exist, so this issue is not seen. But as the name field was
marked as required, other clients using wasmer-config would fail.
Example app.yaml config that works with wasmer-cli but not with other clients:
This commit makes the
AppConfig.name
field optional, thereby allowingprograms to successfully parse configurations without a name field.