Renamed some crates and changed their version to 0.1.0

[ptitSeb]

Renamed:

wasmer-wasi => wasmer-wasix 0.1.0
wasmer-wasi-types =>wasmer-wasix-types  0.1.0
wasmer-sys-utils 0.1.0
wasmer-vfs => virtfs 0.1.0
wasmer-vnet => virtnet 0.1.0
wasmer-wasi-local-networking  => virtnet-native  0.1.0
wasi-experimental-io-devices => wasix-experimental-io-devices 0.1.0

[theduke]

Did you not rename the directories on purpose?

The repo would become very inconsistent and confusing without aligning them with the crate names.

But this will be a very annoying change though for all open PRs, so if we do this we please need to merge #3653 first, because that's a large PR, and rebasing this PR on top of that one will be much easier than the other way around.

Alternative is to first merge without renaming the directories, try to get all large PRs in and then do the dir rename as a second PR.

[ptitSeb]

Did you not rename the directories on purpose?

The repo would become very inconsistent and confusing without aligning them with the crate names.

But this will be a very annoying change though for all open PRs, so if we do this we please need to merge #3653 first, because that's a large PR, and rebasing this PR on top of that one will be much easier than the other way around.

Alternative is to first merge without renaming the directories, try to get all large PRs in and then do the dir rename as a second PR.

Yes, that was on purpose. I propose the crates that have ben rename to wasix instead of wasi have the folder renamed. I'm less sure about the other that already have a different folder name. But I can do it too.

How closed is the #3653 to be merged?

[theduke]

I think @john-sharratt is still fixing some stuff.

If we want to get this beta out quickly we can merge without renaming the directories and do that as a followup - but I do think we should get that PR in first either way because the conflicts would be annoying regardless.

I'm less sure about the other that already have a different folder name.

I actually see it almost the other way around - it's more important for virtfs / virtnet, etc, because those crates won't be changed back again. The ones that we want to eventually rename back to the old names could theoretically keep their old names. But I think it's better to rename them as well to keep the repo consistent.

[ptitSeb]

I'm fine with renaming all the foler. It's just that it will be an anoying PR to handle for sure.

[syrusakbary]

I've done a deeper review of the naming, and I don't think we should use virt-fs (virtfs is already a term in virtio).

I'd go with:

wasmer-wasi => wasmer-wasix 0.1.0
wasmer-wasi-types =>wasmer-wasix-types  0.1.0
wasmer-sys-utils 0.1.0
wasmer-vfs => virtual-fs 0.1.0
wasmer-vnet => virtual-net 0.1.0
wasmer-wasi-local-networking  => PUT THIS INSIDE OF virtual-net/host.rs (I don't see any reason why not?)
wasi-experimental-io-devices => wasix-experimental-io-devices 0.1.0