-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 824
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feat/wasmer.wasm #2835
Feat/wasmer.wasm #2835
Conversation
…er-singlepass to use it
… pass do not depend from vm anymore)
…part, not the run part
…ween different bitness (wasm32 vs 64bits)
Side question: what is the diff between api/sys and api/wasm ? (in code, what are the things unused? Both look pretty similar to me but I might be missing something!) |
Many "runtime"' only parts are just empty, like |
Cranelift is now updated in master. Can you update the PR and also see if we can get cranelift working? |
You can merge this PR and I'll work on Cranelift next week. |
I'm concerned about the amount of code duplication in this PR. It introduces a whole new copy of the |
Note that they are unimplemented because they will not work in a wasm context (not because I'm lazy). |
I'm not sure how that would reduce code duplication. Both engine & compiler are needed, and that's already mostly how wasmer.wasm is built, with as minimum as possible dependancies, but while trying to limit the amount of |
Closing this PR as it was done and merged in #2851 |
Description
Allow WASMER to be built as WASM, with compile ability (only singlepass compiler and universal engine for now)