-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 824
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cranelift: enable SIMD based on actual Wasm features #2224
Conversation
bors r+ |
2224: Cranelift simd r=syrusakbary a=jubianchi # Review - [ ] Add a short description of the the change to the CHANGELOG.md file Co-authored-by: jubianchi <[email protected]>
Build failed: |
bors r+ |
2224: Cranelift simd r=syrusakbary a=jubianchi # Review - [ ] Add a short description of the the change to the CHANGELOG.md file Co-authored-by: jubianchi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Syrus Akbary <[email protected]>
Build failed: |
bors r+ |
2224: Cranelift: enable SIMD based on actual Wasm features r=syrusakbary a=jubianchi # Review - [ ] Add a short description of the the change to the CHANGELOG.md file Co-authored-by: jubianchi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Syrus Akbary <[email protected]>
Build failed: |
09ce851
to
1231cb2
Compare
1231cb2
to
90344a9
Compare
bors r+ |
2224: Cranelift: enable SIMD based on actual Wasm features r=jubianchi a=jubianchi # Review - [ ] Add a short description of the the change to the CHANGELOG.md file Co-authored-by: jubianchi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Syrus Akbary <[email protected]>
Build failed: |
This reverts commit 90344a9.
bors try |
tryBuild failed: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I messaged about this on Slack, but I don't think we want Features::enable_simd
to be related to this other use of simd which is entirely unrelated as I understand it. If we want to control low-level compiler details with Features
, I think we need to add new fields, ideally in a new sub-struct to keep things organized
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the title is misleading now, but my previous objection seems to no longer be in the PR. I do think we need to be careful about separating the ideas of codegen simd from Wasm simd though
bors try |
# Conflicts: # lib/deprecated/runtime-core/Cargo.lock
bors r+ |
2224: Cranelift: enable SIMD based on actual Wasm features r=syrusakbary a=jubianchi # Review - [ ] Add a short description of the the change to the CHANGELOG.md file Co-authored-by: jubianchi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Syrus Akbary <[email protected]>
Build failed: |
bors r+ |
2224: Cranelift: enable SIMD based on actual Wasm features r=MarkMcCaskey a=jubianchi # Review - [ ] Add a short description of the the change to the CHANGELOG.md file Co-authored-by: jubianchi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Syrus Akbary <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Mark McCaskey <[email protected]>
Build failed: |
…ift-simd # Conflicts: # Cargo.lock # fuzz/Cargo.lock # lib/compiler-cranelift/Cargo.toml # lib/deprecated/runtime-core/Cargo.lock
bors r+ |
2224: Cranelift: enable SIMD based on actual Wasm features r=syrusakbary a=jubianchi # Review - [ ] Add a short description of the the change to the CHANGELOG.md file Co-authored-by: jubianchi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Syrus Akbary <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Mark McCaskey <[email protected]>
Build failed: |
bors r+ |
Review