DO NOT MERGE YET: Drop support for implements statement#106
Conversation
|
@saschanaz, when you have minute, could you please rebase? |
51df764 to
ed11e8f
Compare
|
@saschanaz, you should probably rebase this before it gets worst. |
ed11e8f to
6ae1fc8
Compare
f1303a9 to
19f13d3
Compare
|
Travis says "This is not an active repository", any idea what happened there? @marcoscaceres |
|
No. We (folks in W3C collaboration teams) have randomly had Travis being disabled. We've asked GitHub for help, but they were not able to isolate the problem. Looking at Settings for the repo, I see a Services deprecation warning, with related blog post: https://developer.github.com/changes/2018-04-25-github-services-deprecation/ |
|
Sent an empty commit in an attempt to restart Travis. This branch wasn't showing up :/ |
|
Starting to get a little of bit of bit rot here. @saschanaz, mind updating it? |
962149d to
5a7e8c6
Compare
5a7e8c6 to
4796133
Compare
|
Do we still have a blocker here? |
|
It might accelerate things if we send a PR to fix w3c/webappsec-credential-management#111. @saschanaz, I've not looked at the appropriate use of |
|
Once the Credential Management spec is fixed, I think it automatically fixes web-platform-tests/wpt#8053 - because all the updated specs will be testing what was required there. I've asked @tobie to clarify if my assumption holds. |
caf8bb0 to
32f76c9
Compare
32f76c9 to
f8ef299
Compare
|
I think we should consider merging this. All the specs have been updated. The WPT issues can be fixed incrementally (along with any now outdated WebIDL in WPT). |
f8ef299 to
98125c4
Compare
|
I have no objection. I know some specs haven't updated their snapshots yet, but that's okay for me. |
|
#yolo 😅 |
Fixes #98, but merge after specs remove the syntax.