Skip to content

Conversation

@sadym-chromium
Copy link
Contributor

@sadym-chromium sadym-chromium commented Dec 22, 2025

Alternative to #1922


Preview | Diff

@sadym-chromium sadym-chromium marked this pull request as draft December 23, 2025 11:09
@sadym-chromium sadym-chromium marked this pull request as ready for review January 14, 2026 16:29
@whimboo
Copy link
Contributor

whimboo commented Jan 16, 2026

Personally I like this more than the other approach given that it extends the feature set and will not cause backward incompatibility issues.

@sadym-chromium I assume you want to get a first feedback first before adding the capability processing and deserialization steps, right?

@sadym-chromium
Copy link
Contributor Author

Personally I like this more than the other approach given that it extends the feature set and will not cause backward incompatibility issues.

@sadym-chromium I assume you want to get a first feedback first before adding the capability processing and deserialization steps, right?

This approach uses the current syntax with "valid values", so technically the parsing algo is not required.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants