Dropping skos:Concept and skos:ConceptScheme in fig 1 as the ranges for dcat:theme and dcat:themeTaxonomy
#1558
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…of the dcat:theme and dcat:themeTaxonomy relaxation
riccardoAlbertoni
requested review from
dr-shorthair,
pwin,
agbeltran,
andrea-perego and
davebrowning
riccardoAlbertoni
changed the title
and skos:ConceptScheme in fig 1 as the ranges for dcat:theme and dcat:themeTaxonomy` skos:Concept and skos:ConceptScheme in fig 1 as the ranges for dcat:theme and dcat:themeTaxonomy
15 tasks
|
droped foaf:Agent from the diagram as we discussed in the call https://www.w3.org/2023/02/07-dxwgdcat-minutes.html Please revised the PR |
dr-shorthair
approved these changes
Feb 8, 2023
davebrowning
approved these changes
Feb 9, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Even if we have written that the diagram in fig 1 is not normative and the caveat about open world philosophy, having
skos:Conceptandskos:ConceptSchemein fig 1 as the ranges fordcat:themeanddcat:themeTaxonomycan be slightly misleading to 'casual' readers.Shall we remove
skos:Conceptandskos:ConceptSchemefrom figure 1, so that there is no chance of confusion?This PR closes #1557