Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

do not use operator executor for disabled buttons #5236

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ritch
Copy link
Contributor

@ritch ritch commented Dec 6, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced the OperatorExecutionButton to directly render a disabled state when the button is inactive, improving user experience by simplifying the button's behavior.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Resolved issues with rendering logic when the button is disabled, ensuring consistent behavior across the application.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Walkthrough

The OperatorExecutionButton component has been updated to implement an early return when the disabled prop is set to true. In this scenario, the component directly renders a disabled Button, omitting the rendering of the OperatorExecutionTrigger. This adjustment simplifies the rendering logic while maintaining the existing functionality of the component, including the handling of props and children.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
app/packages/operators/src/components/OperatorExecutionButton/index.tsx Modified to include an early return for the disabled prop, rendering a disabled Button directly.

Poem

In the meadow where buttons play,
A new change has come to stay.
When disabled, they now rest,
A simple path, we’ve done our best.
Hopping forward, we cheer with glee,
For clearer code, as bright as can be! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
app/packages/operators/src/components/OperatorExecutionButton/index.tsx (2)

40-46: Consider prop consistency between render paths

The early return pattern is a good optimization, but there's a subtle difference in how the disabled prop is handled between the two render paths. The main path passes disabled to both OperatorExecutionTrigger and Button, while the early return only passes it to Button.

Consider this more explicit implementation:

   if (disabled) {
     return (
-      <Button disabled {...props}>
+      <Button disabled={disabled} {...props}>
         {children}
       </Button>
     );
   }

Line range hint 18-39: Consider extracting and extending props interface

The component's props are well-typed, but we could improve type reusability and maintainability.

Consider this improvement:

import { ButtonProps } from '@mui/material';

interface OperatorExecutionButtonProps extends ButtonProps {
  operatorUri: string;
  onSuccess?: ExecutionCallback;
  onError?: ExecutionErrorCallback;
  executionParams?: object;
  onOptionSelected?: (option: OperatorExecutionOption) => void;
}

export const OperatorExecutionButton: React.FC<OperatorExecutionButtonProps> = ({
  operatorUri,
  onSuccess,
  onError,
  onClick,
  executionParams,
  onOptionSelected,
  disabled,
  children,
  ...props
}) => {
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5047312 and 255cefa.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/packages/operators/src/components/OperatorExecutionButton/index.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
app/packages/operators/src/components/OperatorExecutionButton/index.tsx (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

🔇 Additional comments (1)
app/packages/operators/src/components/OperatorExecutionButton/index.tsx (1)

40-46: Verify operator execution behavior with disabled state

The optimization to prevent mounting OperatorExecutionTrigger when disabled is a good architectural improvement. However, let's verify that no operator-related side effects depend on the trigger component being mounted.

✅ Verification successful

Early return for disabled state is safe to implement

The code review shows that the OperatorExecutionTrigger component already handles the disabled state appropriately:

  • It prevents menu opening when disabled (clickHandler sets isMenuOpen to false)
  • The menu's open prop is controlled by isMenuOpen && !disabled
  • No side effects or state updates occur when the component is disabled
  • All operator execution logic is tied to menu interactions, which are already prevented in disabled state

The early return optimization in OperatorExecutionButton is safe as it maintains the same behavior while improving performance.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any dependencies on OperatorExecutionTrigger mounting
rg -A 5 "OperatorExecutionTrigger" --type ts --type tsx

# Search for any effects or state updates in the trigger component
ast-grep --pattern 'useEffect($_) { $$$ }' src/components/OperatorExecutionTrigger

Length of output: 255


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for OperatorExecutionTrigger in the codebase
fd -e ts -e tsx -e js -e jsx | xargs rg -l "OperatorExecutionTrigger"

# Once we find the file, let's check its content and any effects
fd -e ts -e tsx -e js -e jsx | xargs rg "OperatorExecutionTrigger" -A 10

# Look for any useEffect hooks in files containing OperatorExecutionTrigger
fd -e ts -e tsx -e js -e jsx | xargs rg "OperatorExecutionTrigger" -l | xargs rg "useEffect"

Length of output: 5539


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of OperatorExecutionTrigger component to understand its behavior
cat app/packages/operators/src/components/OperatorExecutionTrigger/index.tsx

# Look for any state management or menu-related code in the trigger component
rg -A 10 "const \[.*\].*useState" app/packages/operators/src/components/OperatorExecutionTrigger/index.tsx

# Check for any menu-related imports or components
rg "OperatorExecutionMenu" app/packages/operators/src/components/OperatorExecutionTrigger/index.tsx -A 5

Length of output: 5044

Base automatically changed from merge/release/v1.1.0 to develop December 7, 2024 00:05
Copy link
Contributor

@manivoxel51 manivoxel51 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🍨

@@ -37,6 +37,14 @@ export const OperatorExecutionButton = ({
disabled?: boolean;
children: React.ReactNode;
}) => {
if (disabled) {
return (
<Button disabled {...props}>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

would this change show the tooltip when disabled as well?

could cause an issue in DQ panel where we use disabled and title to show permission messaging.

operator_button = types.OperatorExecutionButtonView(
                    icon="expand_more",
                    operator=operator_mapping[issue_type],
                    on_success=self.computation_handler,
                    on_error=self.cancel_compute,
                    params={
                        "issue_type": issue_type,
                    },
                    on_option_selected=self._on_compute_option_selected,
                    label=button_string,
                    disabled=no_access or is_computing,
                    title=(NOT_PERMITTED_TEXT if no_access else ""),
                    componentsProps={
                        "container": {
                            "sx": {
                                "display": "flex",
                                "justifyContent": "center",
                            }
                        }
                    },
                )
                card_content.obj(
                    "execution_button",
                    view=operator_button,
                )

we can wrap this Button with TitleProvider and pass the props to keep it backward compatible

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It does - note that this change is already in teams.

@ritch ritch requested a review from manivoxel51 December 19, 2024 18:10
Copy link
Contributor

@manivoxel51 manivoxel51 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🍨

@ritch ritch enabled auto-merge December 23, 2024 19:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants