Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Discussion] Add LeaderPersonIds to Party #364

Closed
jdmgoogle opened this issue Jul 10, 2017 · 7 comments
Closed

[Discussion] Add LeaderPersonIds to Party #364

jdmgoogle opened this issue Jul 10, 2017 · 7 comments
Labels
documentation enhancement nist compatibility
Milestone
Version 6.0

Comments

@jdmgoogle
Copy link
Contributor

It may be useful to know the leader of a political party (for some definition of "leader").

This is to be compatible with usnistgov/Voting#9
@jdmgoogle jdmgoogle added this to the Version 5.2 milestone Jul 10, 2017
@afsmythe afsmythe mentioned this issue Jul 12, 2019
Closed
@afsmythe afsmythe modified the milestones: Version 5.2, Version 5.3 Dec 19, 2019
@jswiesner
Copy link
Collaborator

This looks like a reasonable and straightforward addition to 6.0. Thoughts on moving this to the 6.0 milestone?

@jdmgoogle
Copy link
Contributor Author

I support this.

Thoughts, @afsmythe et al?

@afsmythe
Copy link

Sounds good!

@jswiesner
Copy link
Collaborator

Looks like we're aligned on this feature. @afsmythe could you move to the 6.0 milestone (I don't have permission)?

@jdmgoogle jdmgoogle modified the milestones: Version 5.3, Version 6.0 Jul 2, 2021
@jswiesner
Copy link
Collaborator

Implemented with:

Documented with:

Can we close this issue now?

@afsmythe
Copy link

Fine with me.

@jswiesner
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing this issue as a result of #364 (comment).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
documentation enhancement nist compatibility
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Version 6.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@jdmgoogle @afsmythe @jswiesner