Skip to content

VortexResult::flatten -> unnest#2361

Merged
AdamGS merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
adamg/flatten-to-unnest
Feb 14, 2025
Merged

VortexResult::flatten -> unnest#2361
AdamGS merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
adamg/flatten-to-unnest

Conversation

@AdamGS
Copy link
Contributor

@AdamGS AdamGS commented Feb 14, 2025

Didn't actually check that in #2360, apparently the compiler doesn't like flatten becuase it exists in an unstable feature.

This PR is dedicated to @danking as the chief haskeller.

@AdamGS AdamGS requested a review from danking February 14, 2025 14:46
Copy link
Contributor

@gatesn gatesn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why don't we just enable the unstable feature?

@AdamGS
Copy link
Contributor Author

AdamGS commented Feb 14, 2025

makes it harder long term to lower our msrv/move to stable

@AdamGS
Copy link
Contributor Author

AdamGS commented Feb 14, 2025

its been unstable for four years now, IDK what's the roadmap to stability and seems like there are still some open questions in that issue

@AdamGS AdamGS enabled auto-merge (squash) February 14, 2025 14:53
Copy link
Contributor

@danking danking left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My dear gentleman, I heartily approve.

@AdamGS AdamGS merged commit 489262d into develop Feb 14, 2025
17 checks passed
@AdamGS AdamGS deleted the adamg/flatten-to-unnest branch February 14, 2025 15:03
AdamGS added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2025
Didn't actually check that in #2360, apparently the compiler doesn't
like `flatten` becuase it exists in an unstable feature.

This PR is dedicated to @danking as the chief
[haskeller](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Haskeller).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants