Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

delete reservation plugin doc #3546

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

hwdef
Copy link
Member

@hwdef hwdef commented Jun 27, 2024

Reservation plugin has been deleted. This doc is no longer needed. It will confuse users.
Additionally, I recommend cleaning up documents that have expired.

@volcano-sh-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please assign shinytang6
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @shinytang6 in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@volcano-sh-bot volcano-sh-bot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 27, 2024
@hwdef
Copy link
Member Author

hwdef commented Jun 27, 2024

/assign @Monokaix @lowang-bh

@Monokaix
Copy link
Member

have the problems mentioned in this doc been resolved?
And I saw that #748 mentioned that this feature is released, but I didn't see that.

@hwdef
Copy link
Member Author

hwdef commented Jun 27, 2024

I think the reservation plugin has been deprecated and replaced by the SLA plugin.
@Thor-wl Can you clarify?

@@ -1,148 +0,0 @@
# Volcano Resource Reservation For Target Jobs
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we should have a deprecated directory and put this design document in it instead of deleting it directly. This way users can also refer to the previous documents. @Monokaix WDYT

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we should have a deprecated directory and put this design document in it instead of deleting it directly. This way users can also refer to the previous documents. @Monokaix WDYT

If users want to view old documents, they can switch to the old branch

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can mark it as deprecated and delete it in next version: )

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Monokaix
how to mark it as deprecated? write in title? create a deprecated folder?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we can just edit the doc directly: ), and whether it's sovled by sla-plugin should also be checked.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
retest-not-required-docs-only size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants