Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bugfix] Fix speculative decoding with MLPSpeculator with padded vocabulary #7218

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 9, 2024

Conversation

tjohnson31415
Copy link
Contributor

@tjohnson31415 tjohnson31415 commented Aug 6, 2024

When using speculative decoding with an MLPSpeculator model that has a vocab_size that is not a multiple of 64 (eg. ibm-granite/granite-7b-instruct), the truncation of the padding in logits_processor was operating on the wrong dimension, so the vocab dimension was not truncated. This would lead to an out-of-bounds type error later in the processing in rejection_sampling.py.

Also, in my debugging I enabled strict_mode to try to catch the error. Even after applying the fix, strict_mode still failed. This is because the order of the arguments was incorrect. I fixed that ordering in this PR as well.

FIX #7212

BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ THE CHECKLIST BELOW AND FILL IN THE DESCRIPTION ABOVE


PR Checklist (Click to Expand)

Thank you for your contribution to vLLM! Before submitting the pull request, please ensure the PR meets the following criteria. This helps vLLM maintain the code quality and improve the efficiency of the review process.

PR Title and Classification

Only specific types of PRs will be reviewed. The PR title is prefixed appropriately to indicate the type of change. Please use one of the following:

  • [Bugfix] for bug fixes.
  • [CI/Build] for build or continuous integration improvements.
  • [Doc] for documentation fixes and improvements.
  • [Model] for adding a new model or improving an existing model. Model name should appear in the title.
  • [Frontend] For changes on the vLLM frontend (e.g., OpenAI API server, LLM class, etc.)
  • [Kernel] for changes affecting CUDA kernels or other compute kernels.
  • [Core] for changes in the core vLLM logic (e.g., LLMEngine, AsyncLLMEngine, Scheduler, etc.)
  • [Hardware][Vendor] for hardware-specific changes. Vendor name should appear in the prefix (e.g., [Hardware][AMD]).
  • [Misc] for PRs that do not fit the above categories. Please use this sparingly.

Note: If the PR spans more than one category, please include all relevant prefixes.

Code Quality

The PR need to meet the following code quality standards:

  • We adhere to Google Python style guide and Google C++ style guide.
  • Pass all linter checks. Please use format.sh to format your code.
  • The code need to be well-documented to ensure future contributors can easily understand the code.
  • Include sufficient tests to ensure the project to stay correct and robust. This includes both unit tests and integration tests.
  • Please add documentation to docs/source/ if the PR modifies the user-facing behaviors of vLLM. It helps vLLM user understand and utilize the new features or changes.

Notes for Large Changes

Please keep the changes as concise as possible. For major architectural changes (>500 LOC excluding kernel/data/config/test), we would expect a GitHub issue (RFC) discussing the technical design and justification. Otherwise, we will tag it with rfc-required and might not go through the PR.

What to Expect for the Reviews

The goal of the vLLM team is to be a transparent reviewing machine. We would like to make the review process transparent and efficient and make sure no contributor feel confused or frustrated. However, the vLLM team is small, so we need to prioritize some PRs over others. Here is what you can expect from the review process:

  • After the PR is submitted, the PR will be assigned to a reviewer. Every reviewer will pick up the PRs based on their expertise and availability.
  • After the PR is assigned, the reviewer will provide status update every 2-3 days. If the PR is not reviewed within 7 days, please feel free to ping the reviewer or the vLLM team.
  • After the review, the reviewer will put an action-required label on the PR if there are changes required. The contributor should address the comments and ping the reviewer to re-review the PR.
  • Please respond to all comments within a reasonable time frame. If a comment isn't clear or you disagree with a suggestion, feel free to ask for clarification or discuss the suggestion.

Thank You

Finally, thank you for taking the time to read these guidelines and for your interest in contributing to vLLM. Your contributions make vLLM a great tool for everyone!

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 6, 2024

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.
Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which consists a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of default ones by unblocking the steps in your fast-check build on Buildkite UI.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, please make sure to run full CI as it is required to merge (or just use auto-merge).

To run full CI, you can do one of these:

  • Comment /ready on the PR
  • Add ready label to the PR
  • Enable auto-merge.

🚀

Copy link
Member

@njhill njhill left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @tjohnson31415!

@tjohnson31415 tjohnson31415 changed the title [Bugfix] Fix speculative decoding with models with padded vocabularies [Bugfix] Fix speculative decoding with MLPSpeculator with padded vocabulary Aug 8, 2024
@tjohnson31415 tjohnson31415 marked this pull request as ready for review August 8, 2024 21:29
@njhill njhill added the ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed label Aug 8, 2024
@njhill njhill merged commit 99b4cf5 into vllm-project:main Aug 9, 2024
50 checks passed
@tjohnson31415 tjohnson31415 deleted the spec-decoding-fixes branch August 9, 2024 15:41
sfc-gh-mkeralapura pushed a commit to sfc-gh-mkeralapura/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2024
dtrifiro pushed a commit to dtrifiro/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2024
kylesayrs pushed a commit to neuralmagic/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2024
fialhocoelho pushed a commit to opendatahub-io/vllm that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2024
Alvant pushed a commit to compressa-ai/vllm that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2024
KuntaiDu pushed a commit to KuntaiDu/vllm that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: CUDA error when using speculative decoding with ibm-granite/granite-7b-instruct
2 participants