Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
[Core] Enable KimiLinear (KDA/GDN + MLA) PD Separation via NIXL #44848
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Core] Enable KimiLinear (KDA/GDN + MLA) PD Separation via NIXL #44848
Changes from 7 commits
75825f5de8591a256c1fd8e048f5d8a4ad51987f5762868b2ebe738559d26deea8f8f0c73c2672120f7d0c0f050fe2016f1f4173f86364267de4e5a69d0bc69b0c34901ddbad68222362356438c3b19e3ded791c8115e25abc27a15240efc31e960a6f73e04ee1caa1fae2b32deb070a824eb174abbd1bbf6044f37feb1f306f9bcFile filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Jump to
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not a fan of this pattern either, let's do a proper check inside transfer_topo, we should have the elements to determine is this is the case we're trying to catch, and get rid of the except here @JaredforReal
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have moved the except to utils.py, and replaced block size ratio assert with new comment.
Open to more suggestions
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.