-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16.7k
Fix RMSNorm hidden_size validation crash for weightless norms #39073
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Chessing234
wants to merge
3
commits into
vllm-project:main
from
Chessing234:fix/gemma4-rms-norm-validation
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While this change prevents the
ValueErrorwhenweightisNone, it leaves the logic inconsistent for the rest of the function. Specifically,hidden_sizeis used later at line 218 to validatevariance_size_override. Ifhidden_sizeis incorrect (e.g., 5376 instead of 72), the checkif hidden_size < variance_size_overridewill be performed against the wrong value, which could lead to anIndexErrorduring slicing at line 224 if an invalid override is provided.Additionally, this fix only addresses the
forward_staticpath. Theforward_cudaandforward_hipmethods still passself.weight.datato the kernels even whenhas_weightisFalse. Sinceself.weightis initialized using the (potentially incorrect)hidden_size, those kernels will likely crash due to a size mismatch. You should consider applying a similar check or passingNonein those paths, for example:For this function, updating the local
hidden_sizeto match the actual input dimension whenweightisNoneensures all subsequent logic remains consistent.