-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15k
[Responses API] Sanitize leaked Harmony control tokens in tool names and recipients #35906
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
will-deines
wants to merge
9
commits into
vllm-project:main
Choose a base branch
from
will-deines:harmony-token-sanitization
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2d1aadb
[Responses API] Sanitize leaked Harmony control tokens in tool names …
garrio-1 8e05724
Fix Gemini review issues: sanitize message history, structured recipi…
garrio-1 41170ec
Fix pre-commit formatting: import order, line length, trailing blank …
garrio-1 599f35c
fix: use dynamic role instead of hardcoded 'assistant' and strengthen…
garrio-1 714ad90
fix(harmony): discard free text between harmony channel messages
garrio-1 f12639b
Merge branch 'main' into harmony-token-sanitization
will-deines b871dfc
fix(harmony): derive role from parser state instead of non-existent a…
garrio-1 3ce8294
fix(harmony): prevent last_tok from recording discarded tokens and fi…
garrio-1 f475a89
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into harmony-token-sanit…
garrio-1 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The test
test_constrain_in_header_skippedverifies that two messages are produced after recovering from a malformed sequence, but it only asserts the content of the first message. To ensure the recovery logic is fully correct and the second message is parsed as expected, you should also add an assertion for the content of the second message.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added the missing assertion for the second message content. Fixed in 6ef1b2f.