-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15k
[Bugfix] Fix MTP edge case in split_decodes_and_prefills #32716
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
19 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7746bd9
Supporting MTP edge case
Josephasafg 59b96ff
Remove Full CG support for now
Josephasafg fb99299
Handle cuda graph capture
Josephasafg 7ebba3c
Added tests
Josephasafg 9522031
formatting
Josephasafg e5c1fd8
Merge branch 'main' into mtp_edge_case
Josephasafg 6a62bb8
Added has_context to common attention metadata
Josephasafg 6b733ee
Merge branch 'main' into mtp_edge_case
Josephasafg 3276481
Merge branch 'main' into mtp_edge_case
Josephasafg f326fac
Changed to use clear_stale_mamba_states instead of has_context
Josephasafg a63da0f
Reverted tests
Josephasafg fddaf4d
Simplified function
Josephasafg 9cf03a3
reverted unnecessary changes
Josephasafg 9f2b598
Removed redudnant comment
Josephasafg d27f74a
test
Josephasafg 1ad6f2a
mod change
Josephasafg 5506afe
mamba2
Josephasafg c780a50
Added clear_stale_state
Josephasafg 3e9bb2c
Merge pull request #5 from Josephasafg/mtp_edge_case_mod
Josephasafg File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this might cause a cpu/gpu sync because
has_initial_states_dis a GPU tensor?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@benchislett You're right but in order to avoid the cpu<>gpu sync I would have to always run this code or run this code (if we decide to keep this version) on every decode step, regardless if
has_initial_states_dhas any false values. (this could be a cheap "no-op" because we're multiplying by 1 but still or looping over the indices in this PR version. depends what we decide to go with.Do you maybe have another suggestion? I am seeing other functions using
.cpu()which I can also use instead of.all()if better but not sure if its any different