-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20.1k
[Bugfix] Fix fusion for VL models #30244
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
DarkLight1337
merged 7 commits into
vllm-project:main
from
neuralmagic:fix-vl-models-fusion
Dec 14, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7d3e727
Fix fusion for VL models
ElizaWszola 604d613
Deepgemm fix
ElizaWszola d1b6ed1
Match multiple layouts and e8m0 combinations
ElizaWszola 895aed3
Merge branch 'main' into fix-vl-models-fusion
ElizaWszola a198f2a
Merge branch 'main' into fix-vl-models-fusion
ElizaWszola d355515
Unit test for e2e fusion
ElizaWszola 92ca52f
Merge branch 'main' into fix-vl-models-fusion
ElizaWszola File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We don't need a new test, just enable rmsnorm+quant fusion in the other tests!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My reasoning was to test a block-quant model separately, so I don't have to figure out the number of fusions for all models (with the current regex-based counting, block and non-blocks quant rms fusions are counted together), and also so I don't have to make the code inside tests more complicated (block quant rms fusions are supported only when fp8 is enabled).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should address this in a follow up also to reduce the total test running times