Benchmark script for fp8 vs bf16 gemm#17126
Conversation
Signed-off-by: mgoin <mgoin64@gmail.com>
|
👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project. 💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels. Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging. To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add 🚀 |
Signed-off-by: mgoin <mgoin64@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: mgoin <mgoin64@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: mgoin <mgoin64@gmail.com>
alexm-redhat
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, just some nits
Signed-off-by: mgoin <mgoin64@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: mgoin <mgoin64@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: amit <amit.man@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: mgoin <mgoin64@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: amit <amit.man@gmail.com>
Added a new benchmark script to compare BF16 torch gemm vs FP8 gemm in vllm, with and without quantization overhead (
no-quant)Example output: