[Profiler] Add Nsight Systems support for diffusion workers#2382
Closed
lishunyang12 wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
[Profiler] Add Nsight Systems support for diffusion workers#2382lishunyang12 wants to merge 1 commit into
lishunyang12 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
lishunyang12
force-pushed
the
nsight-systems-profiling
branch
from
a6c17e5 to
0ebe551
Compare
Add CudaProfilerWrapper support to DiffusionWorker so that diffusion stages can be profiled with NVIDIA Nsight Systems (nsys). LLM stages already inherit this from vLLM's GPUWorker, but diffusion workers only handled profiler: "torch" until now. Signed-off-by: lishunyang <lishunyang12@163.com>
lishunyang12
force-pushed
the
nsight-systems-profiling
branch
from
0ebe551 to
eaa103c
Compare
Collaborator
Author
|
Closed for now. Will resume in the near future. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Supersedes #1098 which went stale due to extensive rebase requirements.