[Feat] cache-dit for GLM-Image#1399
Conversation
5aac425 to
f962f72
Compare
|
@vllm-omni-reviewer |
🤖 VLLM-Omni PR ReviewCode Review1. OverviewThis PR introduces support for The changes are focused and follow the established patterns in the codebase. The test results demonstrate a significant performance improvement (approximately 40% speedup: 90s/img -> 54s/img) with visually consistent output quality. Assessment: Positive. The implementation is clean, well-documented, and consistent with existing code patterns. 2. Code Quality
3. Architecture & Design
4. Security & Safety
5. Testing & Documentation
6. Specific Suggestions
7. Approval StatusLGTM with suggestions The implementation is solid, follows project conventions, and provides significant performance benefits. The suggestions above are primarily verification points regarding the specific Action: If the internal pipeline signature matches the assumptions in the code (Pattern_0 and separate CFG), this is ready to merge. This review was generated automatically by the VLLM-Omni PR Reviewer Bot |
|
Hi @RuixiangMa 👋 This PR hasn't been updated for 16 days. We're tracking stale PRs for the next release. Could you share the current status? Is there anything blocking progress? Thanks! |
No,it work well for me,awaiting review and merge |
|
@RuixiangMa can you fix the conflicts at first? we can merge it and then upgrade to cache-dit 1.3.0 in #1858 |
Signed-off-by: Lancer <maruixiang6688@gmail.com>
f962f72 to
b84b395
Compare
fixed |
|
fix precommits please, we expect this to be merged asap |
Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access
Signed-off-by: Lancer <maruixiang6688@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Samit <285365963@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Lancer <maruixiang6688@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Samit <285365963@qq.com>
Purpose
support cache-dit for GLM-Image
Test Plan
Test Result