Conversation
|
👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM Ascend project. The following points will speed up your PR merge:
If CI fails, you can run linting and testing checks locally according Contributing and Testing. |
Summary of ChangesHello @wxsIcey, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request primarily focuses on upgrading the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Ignored Files
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates the vLLM dependency and introduces several compatibility fixes to align with upstream changes, primarily by using conditional imports for modules that have been relocated. While the changes are correct, the compatibility logic is duplicated across multiple files. I've added a comment suggesting a refactoring to centralize this logic in a single compatibility module to improve maintainability.
Additionally, the pull request title and summary do not follow the repository's style guide. I have provided suggestions for both below to align with the contribution guidelines.
Suggested PR Title:
[main][Core][BugFix] Fix compatibility with upstream vLLM changesSuggested PR Summary:
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR updates the codebase to be compatible with recent changes in the upstream vLLM repository (after commit `d7e17aaacd5ed1b4b4be6bcfef3a1b7cbc84fc9a`). Specifically, it addresses the relocation of several compilation-related modules such as `VllmInductorPass` and `get_pass_context` which were moved into a `passes` subdirectory in vLLM's `main` branch.
This PR introduces conditional imports based on the vLLM version to maintain backward compatibility with the `v0.15.0` release while supporting newer commits from the `main` branch. It also updates test expectations and relaxes some test assertions to accommodate minor behavioral changes from the upstream update.
Fixes an import problem of `VllmInductorPass` and `get_pass_context` due to [vllm/pull/33731](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/33731).
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, this PR contains internal refactoring and compatibility fixes with no user-facing changes.
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with existing and updated tests. The changes are primarily for compatibility and include test updates to reflect upstream changes.|
This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request. |
Signed-off-by: Meihan-chen <jcccx.cmh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Meihan-chen <jcccx.cmh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Meihan-chen <jcccx.cmh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Meihan-chen <jcccx.cmh@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com>
Signed-off-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com>
Signed-off-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com>
Signed-off-by: wxsIcey <1790571317@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: wxsIcey <1790571317@qq.com>
|
This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request. |
What this PR does / why we need it?
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
How was this patch tested?