Skip to content

[Misc] Bump mooncake version to v0.3.8.post1#6110

Merged
wangxiyuan merged 1 commit intovllm-project:mainfrom
Potabk:mooncake
Jan 22, 2026
Merged

[Misc] Bump mooncake version to v0.3.8.post1#6110
wangxiyuan merged 1 commit intovllm-project:mainfrom
Potabk:mooncake

Conversation

@Potabk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@Potabk Potabk commented Jan 22, 2026

What this PR does / why we need it?

Since the mooncake has the newer release, we pin the tag to latest release

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

How was this patch tested?

Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jan 22, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM Ascend project. The following points will speed up your PR merge:‌‌

  • A PR should do only one thing, smaller PRs enable faster reviews.
  • Every PR should include unit tests and end-to-end tests ‌to ensure it works and is not broken by other future PRs.
  • Write the commit message by fulfilling the PR description to help reviewer and future developers understand.

If CI fails, you can run linting and testing checks locally according Contributing and Testing.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the mooncake version to v0.3.8.post1 across several Dockerfiles and documentation files. The changes are straightforward and consistent. I've added one suggestion to improve consistency in the Dockerfiles by quoting an argument value.

Comment thread Dockerfile.a3
@wangxiyuan wangxiyuan merged commit 37a9cf8 into vllm-project:main Jan 22, 2026
8 checks passed
@Potabk Potabk deleted the mooncake branch January 22, 2026 06:08
845473182 pushed a commit to 845473182/vllm-ascend that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2026
…to qwen3next_rebase

* 'main' of https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend: (51 commits)
  [Bugfix] Remove `use_aclgraph` in mtp_proposer and use `use_cuda_graph` (vllm-project#6032)
  [BugFix] fix 3vl dense model load quant weight (vllm-project#6100)
  [CP&SP] Integrate FIA operator in mla_cp._forward_decode (vllm-project#5641)
  [CI][Doc] Upgrade wheel building's CANN to 8.5.0 and update the Docs (vllm-project#6145)
  [CI]Install clang in dokerfile for triton ascend (vllm-project#4409)
  [Main] Upgrade PTA to 2.9.0 (vllm-project#6112)
  [Graph][Fusion] Add QKVNormRope and QKVNormRopeWithBias (vllm-project#5721)
  [P/D][PCP]bugfix pcp force free twice caused logger error (vllm-project#6124)
  [BugFix]converting pa get_workspace back to capturing (vllm-project#5833)
  [CI] optimize lint term (vllm-project#5986)
  [Bugfix] Fix Triton operator usage for multimodal models based on `the mrope_interleaved` parameter (vllm-project#6042)
  [bugfix][npugraph_ex]fix the model output type issue caused by manually modify FX graph (vllm-project#6015)
  [BugFix] Support setting tp=1 for the Eagle draft model to take effect (vllm-project#6097)
  [Misc] Bump mooncake version to v0.3.8.post1 (vllm-project#6110)
  [Feature]Enable DispatchGmmCombineDecode when eagle is moe with w8a8 or not moe [RFC: issue 5476] (vllm-project#5758)
  [bugfix] adapt_remote_request_id (vllm-project#6051)
  [Feature] Add support of new W4A4_LAOS_DYNAMIC quantization method (vllm-project#5143)
  [Feature] Support DSA-CP for Hybrid scenario (vllm-project#5702)
  [CI] Upgrade CANN to 8.5.0 (vllm-project#6070)
  Default enable MLAPO (vllm-project#5952)
  ...
Potabk added a commit to Potabk/vllm-ascend that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2026
…)"

Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
wangxiyuan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2026
…6164)

### What this PR does / why we need it?
The new version of moonkcake lead to the image build failure. see
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/actions/runs/21236469259/job/61105443733,
we should revert it first
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
vllm-project/vllm@d682094

Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
starmountain1997 pushed a commit to starmountain1997/vllm-ascend that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2026
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Since the mooncake has the newer
[release](https://github.com/kvcache-ai/Mooncake/releases/tag/v0.3.8.post1),
we pin the tag to latest release

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
vllm-project/vllm@d682094

Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
starmountain1997 pushed a commit to starmountain1997/vllm-ascend that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2026
…ject#6110)" (vllm-project#6164)

### What this PR does / why we need it?
The new version of moonkcake lead to the image build failure. see
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/actions/runs/21236469259/job/61105443733,
we should revert it first
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
vllm-project/vllm@d682094

Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
ZRJ026 pushed a commit to ZRJ026/vllm-ascend that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2026
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Since the mooncake has the newer
[release](https://github.com/kvcache-ai/Mooncake/releases/tag/v0.3.8.post1),
we pin the tag to latest release

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
vllm-project/vllm@d682094

Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: zrj026 <zhangrunjiang026@gmail.com>
ZRJ026 pushed a commit to ZRJ026/vllm-ascend that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2026
…ject#6110)" (vllm-project#6164)

### What this PR does / why we need it?
The new version of moonkcake lead to the image build failure. see
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/actions/runs/21236469259/job/61105443733,
we should revert it first
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
vllm-project/vllm@d682094

Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: zrj026 <zhangrunjiang026@gmail.com>
maoxx241 pushed a commit to maoxx241/vllm-ascend that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2026
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Since the mooncake has the newer
[release](https://github.com/kvcache-ai/Mooncake/releases/tag/v0.3.8.post1),
we pin the tag to latest release

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
vllm-project/vllm@d682094

Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
maoxx241 pushed a commit to maoxx241/vllm-ascend that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2026
…ject#6110)" (vllm-project#6164)

### What this PR does / why we need it?
The new version of moonkcake lead to the image build failure. see
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/actions/runs/21236469259/job/61105443733,
we should revert it first
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
vllm-project/vllm@d682094

Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
ZRJ026 pushed a commit to ZRJ026/vllm-ascend that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2026
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Since the mooncake has the newer
[release](https://github.com/kvcache-ai/Mooncake/releases/tag/v0.3.8.post1),
we pin the tag to latest release

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
vllm-project/vllm@d682094

Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: zrj026 <zhangrunjiang026@gmail.com>
ZRJ026 pushed a commit to ZRJ026/vllm-ascend that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2026
…ject#6110)" (vllm-project#6164)

### What this PR does / why we need it?
The new version of moonkcake lead to the image build failure. see
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/actions/runs/21236469259/job/61105443733,
we should revert it first
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
vllm-project/vllm@d682094

Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: zrj026 <zhangrunjiang026@gmail.com>
LCAIZJ pushed a commit to LCAIZJ/vllm-ascend that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2026
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Since the mooncake has the newer
[release](https://github.com/kvcache-ai/Mooncake/releases/tag/v0.3.8.post1),
we pin the tag to latest release

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
vllm-project/vllm@d682094

Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
LCAIZJ pushed a commit to LCAIZJ/vllm-ascend that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2026
…ject#6110)" (vllm-project#6164)

### What this PR does / why we need it?
The new version of moonkcake lead to the image build failure. see
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/actions/runs/21236469259/job/61105443733,
we should revert it first
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
vllm-project/vllm@d682094

Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants