[Bugfix] add in_graph_capturing comment

[dragondream-chen]

What this PR does / why we need it?

Add the value "in_graph_capturing " comment

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

How was this patch tested?

• vLLM version: v0.12.0
• vLLM main: vllm-project/vllm@ad32e3e

[github-actions]

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM Ascend project. The following points will speed up your PR merge:‌‌

• A PR should do only one thing, smaller PRs enable faster reviews.
• Every PR should include unit tests and end-to-end tests ‌to ensure it works and is not broken by other future PRs.
• Write the commit message by fulfilling the PR description to help reviewer and future developers understand.

If CI fails, you can run linting and testing checks locally according Contributing and Testing.

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request introduces a bugfix for speculative decoding with graph capture. The changes correctly propagate the graph capture status to the MTP proposer and adjust the logic within the proposer to only capture the first speculative token generation, which is the intended behavior. A helpful comment has also been added to clarify the purpose of the force_attention flag. The fix appears correct and addresses the issue effectively.

[github-actions]

This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.

[github-actions]

This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request.