Merged
Conversation
Signed-off-by: deepthi <deepthi@planetscale.com>
Collaborator
Author
|
Tested the following cases with a 250G shard:
There was no difference in memory usage between 2 & 3. |
Member
|
For completeness, prior to this change, were you able to reproduce the issues we were seeing with the memory leak? |
Collaborator
Author
I did not try the older version with EDIT[Feb 3, 2020]: |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This fixes a problem with vttablet consuming too much memory during a restore from backup when running with option
-s3_backup_log_level LogDebugWithRequestRetriesSigned-off-by: deepthi deepthi@planetscale.com