Merged
Conversation
Member
|
I'd say |
Member
|
Agreed. I did a double take when I first saw references to |
Contributor
|
+1 for PlanCache. Would be great to change any docs that refer to it as QueryCache as well. We've had some newcomers recently who have been confused by this. |
Member
Author
|
Sounds good. Updated. I'll open a different PR to update tablet server and docs related to that one. |
Contributor
|
LGTM |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Exposed metrics for query cache.
Should we call this metric
PlanCache*to make it consistent with the code?I think it makes more sense to keep it like this (
QueryCache*), so it's consistent with the one in tabletserver. But curious to read what people think about this.Tests