Skip to content

CI: Use new Percona Server repo name#19214

Merged
arthurschreiber merged 1 commit intomainfrom
percona_repo_fix
Jan 25, 2026
Merged

CI: Use new Percona Server repo name#19214
arthurschreiber merged 1 commit intomainfrom
percona_repo_fix

Conversation

@mattlord
Copy link
Member

@mattlord mattlord commented Jan 25, 2026

Description

Percona apparently changed the repo name in their percona-release script from ps80:

sudo percona-release setup ps80

To pdps8.0 as you can see in the failures here: https://github.com/vitessio/vitess/actions/runs/21319915216/job/61369826966?pr=19201

Note

We should backport this to v22. v23 already has it via this PR: #19201

Related Issue(s)

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported to release branches
  • If this change is to be back-ported to previous releases, a justification is included in the PR description
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on CI?
  • Documentation was added or is not required

Signed-off-by: Matt Lord <mattalord@gmail.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings January 25, 2026 00:07
@mattlord mattlord requested a review from frouioui as a code owner January 25, 2026 00:07
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v24.0.0 milestone Jan 25, 2026
@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required labels Jan 25, 2026
@vitess-bot
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Jan 25, 2026

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@mattlord mattlord removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required labels Jan 25, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates the Percona Server distribution name in CI workflows from the deprecated ps80 to the new pdps8.0 format, as required by changes in Percona's percona-release script. This change is necessary to fix failing CI workflows that use Percona XtraBackup for MySQL 8.0 backup and recovery tests.

Changes:

  • Updated the template file that generates CI workflows to use the new Percona distro name
  • Regenerated three workflow files from the template with the updated distro name

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
test/templates/cluster_endtoend_test.tpl Template file updated to use pdps8.0 instead of ps80 for Percona Server 8.0 setup
.github/workflows/cluster_endtoend_xb_recovery.yml Generated workflow updated with new Percona distro name for XtraBackup recovery tests
.github/workflows/cluster_endtoend_xb_backup.yml Generated workflow updated with new Percona distro name for XtraBackup backup tests
.github/workflows/cluster_endtoend_backup_pitr_xtrabackup.yml Generated workflow updated with new Percona distro name for PITR XtraBackup tests

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@mattlord mattlord changed the title CI: Use new Percona Server distro name CI: Use new Percona Server repo name Jan 25, 2026
@arthurschreiber arthurschreiber merged commit 70c9819 into main Jan 25, 2026
125 of 128 checks passed
@arthurschreiber arthurschreiber deleted the percona_repo_fix branch January 25, 2026 07:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants