Fix linting issues from future config

[marek-saji]

Why?

Fixes issues found while testing the upcoming new version of verkstedt linting config.

Refs VIP-19.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation

  • Updated image markup syntax in documentation files for consistency.

• Chores

  • Optimized cloud deployment workflow container flag handling.
  • Added ESLint configuration for import resolution.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

Walkthrough

The PR updates GitHub Actions workflow configuration to improve container flag handling via shell argument reassembly, converts Markdown image syntax to HTML in documentation files, and adds an ESLint directive to suppress import warnings for GitHub Actions dependencies.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
GitHub Actions Workflow .github/workflows/deploy-cloudrun.yaml	Modified container flag handling: replaced per-flag construction pattern with shell argument reassembly using set -- for conditional flag passing to gcloud deploy commands.
Documentation DESIGN.md, README.md	Converted Markdown image syntax () to HTML <img> tags with empty alt attributes across screenshot references.
ESLint Configuration ref-comment-in-commit/index.mjs	Added top-level ESLint directive comment to suppress unresolved import warnings for @actions/ packages without altering runtime logic.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• feat: add cloudrun deploy job #29: Modifies the same .github/workflows/deploy-cloudrun.yaml file and addresses container/flag handling logic for Cloud Run deployments.

Suggested reviewers

• erolci
• karelchudej

Poem

🐰 A workflow refined with shell's clever dance,
Images dressed in HTML's fancy pants,
Linting whispers hush unresolved cries—
Small tweaks that make the pipeline wise! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Linked Issues check	⚠️ Warning	VIP-19 focuses on creating a new ESLint config package and restructuring the linting system, but this PR only fixes linting issues in existing code files without implementing the core objectives.	This PR addresses linting fixes but does not implement VIP-19's main objectives: creating @verkstedt/lint package, adopting new ESLint format, or reorganizing configs. Consider clarifying whether this is a prerequisite fix or if VIP-19 implementation should follow.
Out of Scope Changes check	❓ Inconclusive	The changes (GitHub Actions workflow updates, Markdown syntax changes, and ESLint directive) are reasonable linting fixes but are not directly aligned with VIP-19's core refactoring objectives.	Review whether the specific changes (e.g., image syntax conversion, ESLint directive addition) are necessary for the future linting config or if they should be deferred until VIP-19 implementation.

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'Fix linting issues from future config' clearly summarizes the main change: addressing linting issues that appeared when testing a new linting configuration.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description explains that the PR fixes issues found while testing an upcoming new linting config and references VIP-19, which is directly related to the changeset.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}