Update with-jest example #27894
Merged
Update with-jest example #27894
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
delbaoliveira
requested review from
ijjk,
leerob,
lfades,
shuding and
timneutkens
as code owners
This was referenced Aug 12, 2021
This was referenced Aug 13, 2021
flybayer
pushed a commit
to blitz-js/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 19, 2021
## Documentation / Examples - [x] Make sure the linting passes This PR updates our current with-jest example to match the examples in upcoming docs, add module alias configuration and be more consistent with Jest conventions.
This was referenced Sep 6, 2021
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Documentation / Examples
This PR updates our current with-jest example to match the examples in upcoming docs, add module alias configuration and be more consistent with Jest conventions.